Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9905
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShah, Pallav J-
dc.contributor.authorBui, Khoi-
dc.contributor.authorBlackmore, Shane-
dc.contributor.authorGordon, Ian R-
dc.contributor.authorHare, David L-
dc.contributor.authorFuller, John A-
dc.contributor.authorSeevanayagam, Siven-
dc.contributor.authorBuxton, Brian F-
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T23:11:10Z
dc.date.available2015-05-15T23:11:10Z
dc.date.issued2005-05-01en
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery : Official Journal of the European Association For Cardio-thoracic Surgery; 27(5): 870-5en
dc.identifier.govdoc15848328en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9905en
dc.description.abstractThe right internal thoracic artery is being used infrequently despite favorable observational angiographic data. Conversely, the radial artery utilization has increased with only limited data available. The purpose of this paper is to re-evaluate the roles of the right internal thoracic artery and the radial artery grafts.We reviewed all ischemia-directed coronary angiographic procedures from January 1996 to December 2003. A total of 219 patients had primary coronary artery bypass grafting with an internal thoracic artery and a radial artery as two of the bypass grafts. Six hundred and seventy-nine (679) graft angiograms (45 saphenous vein, 363 radial artery, 54 right internal thoracic artery and 217 left internal thoracic artery) were studied. The mean period from operation to re-angiogram was 1104+/-761 days. Angiographic outcomes were divided into groups as: (1) patent (<50% stenosis) or (2) failed (>or=50% stenosis, string sign or occluded). A generalized linear mixed model was used to analyze predictors of graft patency. Turnbull's estimates of cumulative patency were used to compare graft failure rates over time.A total of 632/679 (93%) grafts were patent and 47/679 (7%) grafts had failed. Empirical saphenous vein graft patency was 40/45 (89%), radial artery patency 329/363 (91%), right internal thoracic artery patency 51/54 (94%) and left internal thoracic artery patency 212/217 (98%). Pairwise comparisons of patency from the generalized linear mixed model were: LITA>RITA, OR=1.5 (P=0.5); LITA>RA, OR=5.7 (P<0.001); LITA>SV, OR=6.5 (P<0.001); RITA>RA, OR=3.9 (P=0.01); RITA>SV, OR=4.4 (P=0.01); RA>SV, OR=1.1 (P=0.7). Five-year patency estimates from the Turnbull's model were the left internal thoracic artery (95.9%), right internal thoracic artery (91.2%), the radial artery (90.6%) and the saphenous vein (81.8%).Consideration should be given to the routine use of both internal thoracic arteries for coronary artery bypass grafting. When additional grafts are required, there is no evidence to suggest that either the radial artery or saphenous vein is superior.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherAgeden
dc.subject.otherCoronary Angiographyen
dc.subject.otherCoronary Artery Bypass.methodsen
dc.subject.otherCoronary Disease.radiography.surgeryen
dc.subject.otherCoronary Restenosis.radiographyen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherFollow-Up Studiesen
dc.subject.otherGraft Occlusion, Vascular.radiographyen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherLogistic Modelsen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMammary Arteries.transplantationen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherRadial Artery.transplantationen
dc.subject.otherRisk Assessment.methodsen
dc.subject.otherSaphenous Vein.transplantationen
dc.subject.otherTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subject.otherVascular Patencyen
dc.titleHas the in situ right internal thoracic artery been overlooked? An angiographic study of the radial artery, internal thoracic arteries and saphenous vein graft patencies in symptomatic patients.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.01.027en
dc.description.pages870-5en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9554-6556-
dc.identifier.pubmedid15848328-
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherBuxton, Brian F
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
crisitem.author.deptEndocrinology-
crisitem.author.deptCardiac Surgery-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

46
checked on Dec 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.