Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9863
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Donnell, Den
dc.contributor.authorNadurata, Ven
dc.contributor.authorHamer, Aen
dc.contributor.authorKertes, Pen
dc.contributor.authorMohamed, Uen
dc.contributor.authorMohammed, Wen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T23:07:50Z
dc.date.available2015-05-15T23:07:50Z
dc.date.issued2005-01-01en
dc.identifier.citationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : Pace; 28 Suppl 1(): S24-6en
dc.identifier.govdoc15683505en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9863en
dc.description.abstractThe optimal follow-up and long-term programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices are uncertain. The aim of this study was to quantify the temporal variations in programming parameters to optimize the follow-up of these devices. Before, during, and at specified intervals over 9 months after implant, 40 recipients of CRT devices were studied. At each visit, the patients were tested with a fixed sequence of stimulation parameters during echocardiographic and electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings. The optimal AV delay and inter-ventricular delays (V-V) were determined according to echocardiographic criteria. The echocardiographic data were, in turn, compared with the ECG recordings. Among the 40 patients, the optimal stimulation parameters remained unchanged throughout the follow-up in only three patients. In 18 patients, adjustments were required at each follow-up sessions. There was a trend toward reduction in the left ventricular (LV) predominance of the optimal V-V delay and an increase in the AV delay during follow-up. The mean optimal V-V delay at implant was 22 ms (-12 to +32 ms) with the LV activated first, versus 12 ms (-16 to +32 ms) at 9 months. The mean AV delay at implant was 115 ms versus 137 ms at 9 months. Individual changes could not be accurately predicted. The optimal stimulation parameters for CRT vary over time. Detailed, regular reevaluations, and reprogramming of optimal parameters may be appropriate.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherCardiac Pacing, Artificial.methods.standardsen
dc.subject.otherFollow-Up Studiesen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherPacemaker, Artificial.standardsen
dc.subject.otherTime Factorsen
dc.titleLong-term variations in optimal programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitlePacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACEen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Electrophysiology Unit, Austin Health, Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00070.xen
dc.description.pagesS24-6en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15683505en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherO'Donnell, David
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on Dec 26, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.