Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9863
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | O'Donnell, D | en |
dc.contributor.author | Nadurata, V | en |
dc.contributor.author | Hamer, A | en |
dc.contributor.author | Kertes, P | en |
dc.contributor.author | Mohamed, U | en |
dc.contributor.author | Mohammed, W | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-15T23:07:50Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-15T23:07:50Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005-01-01 | en |
dc.identifier.citation | Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : Pace; 28 Suppl 1(): S24-6 | en |
dc.identifier.govdoc | 15683505 | en |
dc.identifier.other | PUBMED | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9863 | en |
dc.description.abstract | The optimal follow-up and long-term programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices are uncertain. The aim of this study was to quantify the temporal variations in programming parameters to optimize the follow-up of these devices. Before, during, and at specified intervals over 9 months after implant, 40 recipients of CRT devices were studied. At each visit, the patients were tested with a fixed sequence of stimulation parameters during echocardiographic and electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings. The optimal AV delay and inter-ventricular delays (V-V) were determined according to echocardiographic criteria. The echocardiographic data were, in turn, compared with the ECG recordings. Among the 40 patients, the optimal stimulation parameters remained unchanged throughout the follow-up in only three patients. In 18 patients, adjustments were required at each follow-up sessions. There was a trend toward reduction in the left ventricular (LV) predominance of the optimal V-V delay and an increase in the AV delay during follow-up. The mean optimal V-V delay at implant was 22 ms (-12 to +32 ms) with the LV activated first, versus 12 ms (-16 to +32 ms) at 9 months. The mean AV delay at implant was 115 ms versus 137 ms at 9 months. Individual changes could not be accurately predicted. The optimal stimulation parameters for CRT vary over time. Detailed, regular reevaluations, and reprogramming of optimal parameters may be appropriate. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject.other | Cardiac Pacing, Artificial.methods.standards | en |
dc.subject.other | Follow-Up Studies | en |
dc.subject.other | Humans | en |
dc.subject.other | Pacemaker, Artificial.standards | en |
dc.subject.other | Time Factors | en |
dc.title | Long-term variations in optimal programming of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices. | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE | en |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Department of Electrophysiology Unit, Austin Health, Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084, Australia | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00070.x | en |
dc.description.pages | S24-6 | en |
dc.relation.url | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15683505 | en |
dc.type.austin | Journal Article | en |
local.name.researcher | O'Donnell, David | |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairetype | Journal Article | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Cardiology | - |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.