Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9838
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBlennerhassett, Jannette Men
dc.contributor.authorDite, Wayneen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-15T23:05:49Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-15T23:05:49Z-
dc.date.issued2004en
dc.identifier.citationThe Australian Journal of Physiotherapy; 50(4): 219-24en
dc.identifier.govdoc15574110en
dc.identifier.otherPUBMEDen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/9838en
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether additional practice of either upper limb or mobility tasks improved functional outcome during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. This prospective, randomised, single blind clinical trial recruited 30 stroke subjects into either an Upper Limb or a Mobility Group. All subjects received their usual rehabilitation and an additional session of task-related practice using a circuit class format. Independent assessors, blinded to group allocation, tested all subjects. Outcome measures used were three items of the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test (JTHFT), two arm items of the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS), and three mobility measures, the Timed Up and Go Test (TUGT), Step Test, and Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT). Both groups improved significantly between pre- and post-tests on all of the mobility measures, however only the Upper Limb Group made a significant improvement on the JTHFT and MAS upper arm items. Following four weeks training, the Mobility Group had better locomotor ability than the Upper Limb Group (between-group differences in the 6MWT of 116.4 m, 95% CI 31.4 to 201.3 m, Step Test 2.6 repetitions, 95% CI -1.0 to 6.2 repetitions, and TUGT -7.6 sec, 95% CI -15.5 to 0.2 sec). The JTHFT dexterity scores in the Upper Limb Group were 6.5 sec (95% CI -7.4 to 20.4 sec) faster than the Mobility Group. Our findings support the use of additional task-related practice during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. The circuit class format was a practical and effective means to provide supervised additional practice that led to significant and meaningful functional gains.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subject.otherArm.physiopathologyen
dc.subject.otherFemaleen
dc.subject.otherHumansen
dc.subject.otherLength of Stayen
dc.subject.otherMaleen
dc.subject.otherMiddle Ageden
dc.subject.otherMovementen
dc.subject.otherPhysical Therapy Modalitiesen
dc.subject.otherProspective Studiesen
dc.subject.otherRecovery of Functionen
dc.subject.otherRehabilitation Centersen
dc.subject.otherRemission, Spontaneousen
dc.subject.otherStroke.physiopathology.rehabilitationen
dc.subject.otherTask Performance and Analysisen
dc.subject.otherTreatment Outcomeen
dc.subject.otherWalkingen
dc.titleAdditional task-related practice improves mobility and upper limb function early after stroke: a randomised controlled trial.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Australian journal of physiotherapyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Royal Talbot Rehabilitation Centre, Austin Health, Kew, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.description.pages219-24en
dc.relation.urlhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15574110en
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen
local.name.researcherBlennerhassett, Jannette M
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Oct 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.