Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35634
Title: The Perioperative NonaGEnaRIan And cenTenarian suRgICal (GERIATRIC) Risk Stratification Tool.
Austin Authors: Weinberg, Laurence ;Lee, Dong Kyu;Fletcher, Luke R ;Ou Yang, Bobby ;Karp, Jadon;Koshy, Anoop N ;Guha, Ranjan;Slifirski, Hugh;D'Silva, Michael R;Bellomo, Rinaldo ;Churilov, Leonid 
Affiliation: Anaesthesia
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Data Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre
Cardiology
Intensive Care
Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Brain Centre at Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Melbourne; Melbourne, Australia.
Issue Date: Dec-2024
Date: 2024
Publication information: Annals of Surgery Open : Perspectives of Surgical History, Education, and Clinical Approaches 2024-12; 5(4)
Abstract: To develop age-appropriate nonaGEnaRIan And cenTenarian suRgICal (GERIATRIC) risk tool for classifying patients who may or may not develop postoperative complications or die within their index hospital admission. There are no validated perioperative risk stratification tools for use in nonagenarian and centenarian patients-people aged 90 to 99 years and >100 years. In this retrospective observational study, nonagenarians and centenarians undergoing any surgical procedure were profiled. Surgery severity was stratified, and the incidence and grade of postoperative complications were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed on a training cohort, followed by calibration on a validation cohort, followed by performance evaluation on a testing cohort. The discriminative accuracy was compared to that of the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index for each outcome. The primary outcome was the ability of the risk stratification tool to effectively classify patients into those who may or may not experience a postoperative complications or mortality within their index hospital stay. A total of 3085 patients were enrolled. The GERIATRIC risk tool had good discriminative accuracy for any postoperative complication [area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC), 0.857; 95% CI = 0.824-0.890] and any severe postoperative complication (AUROC, 0.833; 95% CI = 0.793-0.874), and fair discriminative accuracy for in-hospital mortality (AUROC, 0.780; 95% CI = 0.668-0.893). Compared to the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, The GERIATRIC risk tool was accurate in classifying patients into those who may or may not experience severe complications or die during their index admission. The tool can be used to assist perioperative clinicians with shared decision-making and short-term prognostication.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35634
DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000524
ORCID: 
Journal: Annals of Surgery Open : Perspectives of Surgical History, Education, and Clinical Approaches
Start page: e524
PubMed URL: 39711671
ISSN: 2691-3593
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: anesthesia
centenarian
nonagenarian
risk
surgery
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on May 9, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.