Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35402
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAmadoru, Sanka-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kathryn-
dc.contributor.authorDang, Christa-
dc.contributor.authorSavvas, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorBatchelor, Frances-
dc.contributor.authorYates, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorHuynh, Andrew-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-29T00:19:05Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-29T00:19:05Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/35402-
dc.descriptionResearchFest 2024en_US
dc.description.abstractAims Residential aged care respite clients are vulnerable and prone to poor healthcare outcomes. Improvements in the quality of care for this cohort are urgently needed. However, before proposing changes to care models, a nuanced understanding of relevant issues affecting respite care consumers and professionals is required. We aimed to explore perspectives of consumers, carers, healthcare workers, and aged care workers involved in residential respite care. Methods We used purposive sampling to recruit respite consumers, their family members, residential aged care staff, and healthcare workers across metropolitan Melbourne for semi-structured telephone interviews and electronic surveys regarding residential respite care. Thematic analysis of interviews and surveys was performed. Results Twenty-three semi-structured in-depth interviews (five family members, four residential aged care staff, five general practitioners, two nurse practitioners, seven hospital staff) and twelve electronic surveys (five family members, three general practitioners, four hospital staff) were completed . Five key themes were identified: (1) expectations and understanding of respite care vary; (2) reasons for using respite care vary (3) medical management and healthcare needs of respite residents are complex; (4) care professionals often lack timely access to accurate healthcare information; and (5) structural and funding factors influence the experience and quality of care. Conclusion These findings from multiple stakeholders highlight several issues regarding the benefits of and problems with residential respite care, and the interfaces between the aged care and healthcare sectors. Understanding these issues is pivotal in informing targeted and systemic interventions to improve residential respite care.en_US
dc.titleUnderstanding the consumer, carer and stakeholder experiences of residential respite care: a qualitative studyen_US
dc.typeConference Presentationen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Healthen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationNational Ageing Research Instituteen_US
dc.description.conferencenameResearchFest 2024en_US
dc.description.conferencelocationAustin Healthen_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeConference Presentation-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptAged Care-
Appears in Collections:ResearchFest abstracts
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

52
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.