Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34408
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPilcher, David V-
dc.contributor.authorDuke, Graeme-
dc.contributor.authorRosenow, Melissa-
dc.contributor.authorCoatsworth, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, Genevieve-
dc.contributor.authorTobias, Tracey A-
dc.contributor.authorMcGloughlin, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorHolley, Anthony-
dc.contributor.authorWarrillow, Steven-
dc.contributor.authorCattigan, Claire-
dc.contributor.authorHuckson, Sue-
dc.contributor.authorSberna, Gian-
dc.contributor.authorMcClure, Jason-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-13T05:24:43Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-13T05:24:43Z-
dc.date.issued2021-09-06-
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care and Resuscitation : Journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine 2021-09-06; 23(3)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34408-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To validate a real-time Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Activity Index as a marker of ICU strain from daily data available from the Critical Health Resource Information System (CHRIS), and to investigate the association between this Index and the need to transfer critically ill patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Victoria, Australia. Design: Retrospective observational cohort study. Setting: All 45 hospitals with an ICU in Victoria, Australia. Participants: Patients in all Victorian ICUs and all critically ill patients transferred between Victorian hospitals from 27 June to 6 September 2020. Main outcome measure: Acute interhospital transfer of one or more critically ill patients per day from one site to an ICU in another hospital. Results: 150 patients were transported over 61 days from 29 hospitals (64%). ICU Activity Index scores were higher on days when critical care transfers occurred (median, 1.0 [IQR, 0.4-1.7] v 0.6 [IQR, 0.3-1.2]; P < 0.001). Transfers were more common on days of higher ICU occupancy, higher numbers of ventilated or COVID-19 patients, and when more critical care staff were unavailable. The highest ICU Activity Index scores were observed at hospitals in north-western Melbourne, where the COVID-19 disease burden was greatest. After adjusting for confounding factors, including occupancy and lack of available ICU staff, a rising ICU Activity Index score was associated with an increased risk of a critical care transfer (odds ratio, 4.10; 95% CI, 2.34-7.18; P < 0.001). Conclusions: The ICU Activity Index appeared to be a valid marker of ICU strain during the COVID-19 pandemic. It may be useful as a real-time clinical indicator of ICU activity and predict the need for redistribution of critical ill patients.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleAssessment of a novel marker of ICU strain, the ICU Activity Index, during the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleCritical Care and Resuscitation : Journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Intensive Care, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Service, Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAdult Retrieval Victoria, Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian Government Department of Health, Canberra, ACT, Australia.;Australian National University Medical School, Canberra, ACT, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAdult Retrieval Victoria, Ambulance Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Careen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.51893/2021.3.OA7en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid38046069-
dc.description.volume23-
dc.description.issue3-
dc.description.startpage300-
dc.description.endpage307-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Apr 2, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.