Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34391
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAl-Bassam, Wisam-
dc.contributor.authorParikh, Tapan-
dc.contributor.authorNeto, Ary Serpa-
dc.contributor.authorIdrees, Yamamah-
dc.contributor.authorKubicki, Mark A-
dc.contributor.authorHodgson, Carol L-
dc.contributor.authorSubramaniam, Ashwin-
dc.contributor.authorReddy, Mallikarjuna Ponnapa-
dc.contributor.authorGullapalli, Navya-
dc.contributor.authorMichel, Claire-
dc.contributor.authorMatthewman, Madeline Coxwell-
dc.contributor.authorNaughton, Jack-
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Jason-
dc.contributor.authorShehabi, Yahya-
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldo-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-13T05:24:38Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-13T05:24:38Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-06-
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care and Resuscitation : Journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine 2021-12-06; 23(4)en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/34391-
dc.description.abstractBackground: To our knowledge, the use and management of pressure support ventilation (PSV) in patients receiving prolonged (≥ 7 days) invasive mechanical ventilation has not previously been described. Objective: To collect and analyse data on the use and management of PSV in critically ill patients receiving prolonged ventilation. Design, setting and participants: We performed a multicentre retrospective observational study in Australia, with a focus on PSV in patients ventilated for ≥ 7 days. Main outcome measures: We obtained detailed data on ventilator management twice daily (8am and 8pm moments) for the first 7 days of ventilation. Results: Among 143 consecutive patients, 90/142 (63.4%) had received PSV by Day 7, and PSV accounted for 40.5% (784/1935) of ventilation moments. The most common pressure support level was 10 cmH2O (352/780) observations [45.1%]) with little variation over time, and 37 of 114 patients (32.4%) had no change in pressure support. Mean tidal volume during PSV was 8.3 (7.0-9.5) mL/kg predicted bodyweight (PBW) compared with 7.5 (7.0-8.3) mL/kg PBW during mandatory ventilation (P < 0.001). For 74.6% (247/331) of moments, despite a tidal volume of more than 8 mL/kg PBW, the pressure support level was not changed. Among 122 patients exposed to PSV, 97 (79.5%) received likely over-assistance according to rapid shallow breathing index criteria. Of 784 PSV moments, 411 (52.4%) were also likely over-assisted according to rapid shallow breathing index criteria, and 269/346 (77.7%) having no subsequent adjustment of pressure support. Conclusions: In patients receiving prolonged ventilation, almost two-thirds received PSV, which accounted for 40.5% of mechanical ventilation time. Half of the PSV-treated patients were exposed to high tidal volume and two-thirds to likely over-assistance. These observations provide evidence that can be used to inform interventional studies of PSV management.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titlePressure support ventilation in intensive care patients receiving prolonged invasive ventilation.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleCritical Care and Resuscitation : Journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Sao Paulo, Brazil.;Data Analytics Research and Evaluation Centre, Austin Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Ballarat Base Hospital, Ballarat, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Frankston Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Careen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Data Analytics Research and Evaluation Centre, Austin Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Intensive Care, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.;Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.51893/2021.4.OA4en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid38046681-
dc.description.volume23-
dc.description.issue4-
dc.description.startpage394-
dc.description.endpage402-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

52
checked on Jan 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.