Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33562
Title: | JAK inhibitors and black box warnings: what is the future for JAK inhibitors? | Austin Authors: | Tokareva, Kate;Reid, Pankti;Yang, Victor;Liew, David F L ;Peterson, Alexander C;Baraff, Aaron;Giles, Jon;Singh, Namrata | Affiliation: | Medical Student, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Division of Rheumatology and Committee on Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, Chicago, IL, USA. Rheumatology Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics VA Puget Sound Healthcare System, Seattle, WA, USA. Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. |
Issue Date: | 18-Aug-2023 | Date: | 2023 | Publication information: | Expert Review of Clinical Immunology 2023-08-18, 19(11) | Abstract: | Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have dramatically improved the treatment of various autoimmune, and myeloproliferative disorders. Recently concern has arisen regarding their safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Here we provide a comprehensive summary of the major current and emerging JAKi and their indications, address recent studies on comparative safety, and provide insight into their future and use. We emphasize that the application of the research findings on a case-by-case basis should consider a patient's age, comorbidities, disease for which JAKi is being considered, disease activity, the JAKi target(s), alternate treatment options available for the patient, and the planned duration of JAKi. Rheumatologists are used to prescribing therapies in which a risk to benefit assessment is required as well as with screening and monitoring for safety of medications. Thus, rheumatologists are already practiced in applying specific criteria to effectively screen and monitor patients who are candidates for JAKi therapy. Ongoing research will help to clarify any mechanisms underlying differential safety signals between JAK and other therapies, what the balance between risk and efficacy is, who the susceptible subpopulations are, and whether safety signals are shared between different JAKis and across indications. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33562 | DOI: | 10.1080/1744666X.2023.2249237 | ORCID: | 0000-0002-7645-0919 0000-0003-0013-9865 0000-0001-8451-8883 0000-0001-7149-363X |
Journal: | Expert Review of Clinical Immunology | PubMed URL: | 37596779 | ISSN: | 1744-8409 | Type: | Journal Article Journal Article |
Subjects: | Cancer JAK inhibitors MACE Tnfi comparative safety rheumatoid arthritis shared decision making |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.