Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33506
Title: Perceptions of gender equity among critical care and other health professionals: A cross-sectional survey.
Austin Authors: Thompson, K;Hammond, N;Lynch, D;Van Der Merwe, M;Modra, Lucy J ;Yong, S A;Grattan, S;Stokes-Parish, J
Affiliation: The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia; Nepean and Blue Mountains Local Health District, Kingswood, Australia.
The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia; Malcolm Fisher Department of Intensive Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia.
EMR & Informatics Directorate, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Department of Critical Care, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Intensive Care
Department of Intensive Care and Hyperbaric Medicine, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; ANZIC-RC, Department of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
The George Institute for Global Health, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia; Intensive Care, John Flynn Private Hospital, Tugun, Queensland, Australia.
Issue Date: 11-Aug-2023
Date: 2023
Publication information: Australian Critical Care : Official Journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses 2023-08-11
Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine the association between gender and perceived gender equity in the critical care workforce and other health specialties. We conducted an online cross-sectional survey between September and November 2020. Data on demographics and perceptions of equity including the representation of women across departments and in leadership roles, knowledge of and access to flexible work practices and carers leave, and opportunities for promotion were collected. The study population included health professionals from critical care (defined as intensive care and emergency) and other specialties. We conducted a descriptive gender-disaggregated analysis. A total of 478 respondents (70% women) completed the survey. The mean age of respondents was 43.9 ± 11.2 years. Approximately half of respondents were medical practitioners (n = 235, 54%), followed by nurses (n = 135, 36%)-the remainder were from other professions. The critical care workforce accounted for 280 (64%) of responder practice settings. Statistically significant differences were reported between genders on issues such as having confidence that their department would resolve equity issues (87 [70.7%] men vs. 146 [48.2%] women; p = 0.007), access to flexible work practices (5/124 [4.0%] men vs. 20/305 [6.6%] women p = 0.001), and taking unpaid leave for carer responsibilities (91 [30.3%] women vs 9 [7.4%] men, p < 0.001). This work highlights differences in how men and women perceive gender equity, particularly in the critical care workforce. These findings are important to understand health care practitioners' perceptions of gender equity, as these perceptions inform behaviour.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/33506
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2023.07.003
ORCID: 
Journal: Australian Critical Care : Official Journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses
PubMed URL: 37574389
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Administration and health services
Research ethics
Social issues
ethics – professional
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Jul 9, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.