Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/32927
Title: | Development and initial psychometric evaluation of the Perceptions of Parental Illness Questionnaire for Cancer. | Austin Authors: | Fletcher, Chloe M E;Flight, Ingrid;Gunn, Kate M;Patterson, Pandora;Wilson, Carlene J | Affiliation: | Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia. Department of Rural Health, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Community First Step, Fairfield, New South Wales, Australia Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia. |
Issue Date: | Jul-2023 | Date: | 2023 | Publication information: | Psycho-Oncology 2023 ; 32(7) | Abstract: | To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Perceptions of Parental Illness Questionnaire for Cancer (PPIQ-C) among adolescents and young adults (AYAs). A sample of 372 AYAs (aged 12-24 years) who had a parent diagnosed with cancer completed the PPIQ-C and the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10). Exploratory factor analyses were conducted to examine the dimensional structure of the PPIQ-C. Scale reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha (α) and McDonald's omega (ω). Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to assess construct validity by examining correlations between PPIQ-C subscale scores and K10 total scores. The PPIQ-C is organised into three sections, each with a separate factor structure for items representing identity, core (emotional representations, coherence, timeline, consequences, and controllability), and cause dimensions of the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation. Exploratory factor analyses determined the structure of each section: identity items comprised two subscales (12 items), core items comprised 10 subscales (38 items), and cause items comprised three subscales (11 items). Scale reliability was acceptable for all subscales, except the cause subscale chance or luck attributions (α = 0.665). Correlations between PPIQ-C subscale scores and K10 total scores provided support for construct validity. Preliminary evidence suggests that the PPIQ-C is a reliable, valid, and useful tool for assessing illness perceptions among AYAs with a parent with cancer. The PPIQ-C may be a useful addition to both clinical practice and future research, however further evaluation work is needed to confirm its structure and robustness prior to use. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/32927 | DOI: | 10.1002/pon.6168 | ORCID: | 0000-0002-3663-2451 0000-0001-7704-0869 0000-0003-0837-6814 0000-0002-1686-3252 0000-0002-1883-4690 |
Journal: | Psycho-oncology | PubMed URL: | 37204312 | ISSN: | 1099-1611 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | adolescent cancer chronic illness health belief models oncology psychological wellbeing psychometrics young adult |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.