Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/32319
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Eleanor G R-
dc.contributor.authorQin, Kirby R-
dc.contributor.authorSmart, Philip J-
dc.contributor.authorBurgess, Adele N-
dc.contributor.authorMohan, Helen M-
dc.contributor.authorProud, David M-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T01:49:27Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-22T01:49:27Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-08-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open 2023; 13(3)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/32319-
dc.description.abstractRubber band ligation ('banding') is a common approach for the management of symptomatic haemorrhoids. However, up to 90% of patients experience postprocedural pain, and there is no consensus regarding the optimal analgesic strategy. In practice, patients may receive submucosal local anaesthetic, pudendal nerve block or routine periprocedural analgesia. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of submucosal local anaesthetic, pudendal nerve block and routine analgesia for postprocedural pain in patients undergoing haemorrhoid banding. This is a multicentre, prospective, three-arm, double-blind randomised controlled trial of adults booked for haemorrhoid banding. Participants will be randomised to one of three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio: (1)submucosal bupivacaine injection; (2) pudendal nerve ropivacaine injection and (3) no local anaesthetic. The primary outcome is patient reported postprocedural pain (scored 0-10) from 30 min to 2 weeks. Secondary outcomes include postprocedural analgesia use, time to discharge, patient satisfaction, time to return to work and complications. A sample size of 120 patients is required to achieve statistical significance. This study received Human Research Ethics Approval from the Austin Health Human Research Ethics Committee (March 2022). Trial results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal, and presented at academic meetings. A summary of the trial results will be made available to study participants on request. ACTRN12622000006741p.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectcolorectal surgeryen_US
dc.subjectprotocols & guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectsurgeryen_US
dc.titleLocal anaesthetic infiltration in rubber band ligation of rectal haemorrhoids: study protocol for a three-arm, double-blind randomised controlled trial (PLATIPUS trial).en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMJ Openen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSurgeryen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067896en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3614-5132en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid36889823-
dc.description.volume13-
dc.description.issue3-
dc.description.startpagee067896-
dc.subject.meshtermssecondaryAnesthesia, Local/methods-
dc.subject.meshtermssecondaryHemorrhoids/surgery-
dc.subject.meshtermssecondaryPain, Postoperative/prevention & control-
local.name.researcherBurgess, Adele N
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptMedical Oncology-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Nov 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.