Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/32317
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCox, Narelle S-
dc.contributor.authorHolland, Anne E-
dc.contributor.authorJones, Arwel W-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Christine F-
dc.contributor.authorO'Halloran, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorMahal, Ajay-
dc.contributor.authorHepworth, Graham-
dc.contributor.authorLannin, Natasha A-
dc.date2023-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T01:49:26Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-22T01:49:26Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-08-
dc.identifier.citationTrials 2023; 24(1)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/32317-
dc.description.abstractPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a core component of management people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); yet, people with COPD face significant barriers to attending centre-based PR programs. The emergence of new models of PR, remotely delivered directly into people's homes, has the potential to improve rehabilitation access and completion by providing patients with a choice of rehabilitation location (centre or home). However, offering patients a choice of rehabilitation model is not usual practice. We are undertaking a 14-site cluster randomised controlled trial to determine whether offering choice of PR location improves rehabilitation completion rates resulting in reduced all-cause unplanned hospitalisation over 12 months. The aim of this paper is to describe the protocol for the process evaluation of the HomeBase2 trial. A mixed methods process evaluation, to be undertaken in real time, has been developed in accordance with UK Medical Research Council (MRC) recommendations on process evaluation of complex interventions. This protocol describes the intended use of two theoretical frameworks (RE-AIM framework (Reach; Effectiveness; Adoption; Implementation; Maintenance) and Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF)) to synthesise findings and interpret data from a combination of qualitative (semi-structured interviews) and quantitative (questionnaires, clinical outcome data, intervention fidelity) methodologies. Data will be collected at an intervention, patient and clinician level. Qualitative and quantitative data will be used to derive context-specific potential and actual barriers and facilitators to offering patients choice of rehabilitation location. Acceptability and sustainability of the intervention will be evaluated for future scale-up. The process evaluation described here will appraise the clinical implementation of offering a choice of rehabilitation program location for people with COPD. It will identify and evaluate key factors for future scale-up and sustainability and scale-up of offering choice of pulmonary rehabilitation program model for people. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04217330 Registration date: January 3 2020.en_US
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseen_US
dc.subjectImplementationen_US
dc.subjectProcess evaluationen_US
dc.subjectPulmonary rehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectTelerehabilitationen_US
dc.titleImplementation of offering choice of pulmonary rehabilitation location to people with COPD: a protocol for the process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleTrialsen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationRespiratory Research@Alfred, Department of Immunology and Pathology, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Level 6, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Breathing and Sleepen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Nossal Global Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationStatistical Consulting Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationRespiratory and Sleep Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-023-07179-2en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6977-1028en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid36890526-
dc.description.volume24-
dc.description.issue1-
dc.description.startpage173-
local.name.researcherCox, Narelle S
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptRespiratory and Sleep Medicine-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

72
checked on Dec 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.