Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/31057
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Julie-
dc.contributor.authorLarach, Jose T-
dc.contributor.authorKong, Joseph C H-
dc.contributor.authorRahme, Jessica-
dc.contributor.authorWaters, Peadar S-
dc.contributor.authorWarrier, Satish K-
dc.contributor.authorHeriot, Alexander-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-21T04:48:21Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-21T04:48:21Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-
dc.identifier.citationANZ Journal of Surgery 2023; 93(3)en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/31057-
dc.description.abstractMost studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic surgery, show little difference in clinical outcomes to justify the expense. We systematically reviewed and pooled evidence from studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic rectal resection. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica (EMBASE), and Cochrane databases were searched for studies between 1996 and 2021 comparing clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic rectal surgeries involving total mesorectal excision. Outcome measures included operative times, conversions to open, complications, recurrence and survival rates. Fifty eligible studies compared outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic rectal resections; three were randomized trials. Pooled results showed significantly longer operating times for robotic surgery but lower conversion and complications rates, shorter lengths of stay in hospital, better rates of complete mesorectal resection and better three-year overall survival. However, the low number of randomized studies makes most data subject to bias. Available evidence supports the safety and ongoing use of robotic rectal cancer surgery, while further high-quality evidence is sought to justify the expense.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectcolorectal surgeryen
dc.subjectrectal canceren
dc.subjectrectal neoplasmen
dc.subjectrobotic surgeryen
dc.titleOperative and oncological outcomes after robotic rectal resection compared with laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleANZ journal of surgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationSurgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationColorectal Surgery Unit, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, Richmond, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of post graduate studies, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartamento de Cirugía Digestiva, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile..en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ans.18075en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3090-9090en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1392-2480en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8623-5673en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2947-9206en
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9846-8776en
dc.identifier.pubmedid36214098-
local.name.researcherRahme, Jessica
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

40
checked on Nov 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.