Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/31023
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUdovicich, Cristian-
dc.contributor.authorCallahan, Jason-
dc.contributor.authorBressel, Mathias-
dc.contributor.authorOng, Wee Loon-
dc.contributor.authorPerera, Marlon-
dc.contributor.authorTran, Ben-
dc.contributor.authorAzad, Arun-
dc.contributor.authorHaran, Shankar-
dc.contributor.authorMoon, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorChander, Sarat-
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorEapen, Renu S-
dc.contributor.authorGoad, Jeremy-
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, Nathan-
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, Declan G-
dc.contributor.authorHofman, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorSiva, Shankar-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-21T04:39:42Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-21T04:39:42Z-
dc.date.issued2022-10-
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Urology Open Science 2022; 44: 60-68en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/31023-
dc.description.abstractProstate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed in the neovasculature of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, there remains limited evidence regarding the use of PSMA positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in RCC. To assess the impact of PSMA PET/CT in the management of metastatic RCC. This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent PSMA PET/CT from 2014 to 2020 for restaging or suspected metastatic RCC in a tertiary academic setting. Management plans before and after PSMA PET/CT were recorded. Impact was classified as high (change of treatment intent, modality, or site), medium (change in treatment method), or low. Secondary outcomes included the patient-level detection rate, PSMA PET/CT parameters, sensitivity, and comparison to CT and, if available, fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. Sixty-one patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 54 (89%) had clear cell RCC. PSMA-positive disease was detected in 51 patients (84%). For 30 patients (49%) there was a change in management due to PSMA PET/CT (high impact, 29 patients, 48%). In 15 patients (25%), more metastases were detected on PSMA PET/CT than on CT. The sensitivity of combined PSMA PET/CT and diagnostic CT was 91% (95% confidence interval 77-98%). In a subcohort of 40 patients, the detection rate was 88% for PSMA and 75% for FDG PET/CT (p = 0.17). The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) was higher for PSMA than for FDG PET/CT (15.2 vs 8.0; p = 0.02). Limitations include selection bias due to the retrospective design, and a lack of corresponding histopathology for all patients. PSMA PET/CT is a promising imaging modality in metastatic RCC and led to a change in management in 49% of patients. PSMA PET/CT detected additional metastases compared to CT in 25% of patients and registered a significantly higher SUVmax than FDG PET/CT. Prospective studies are required to further define its role. We report on a group of patients undergoing a new type of imaging for suspected advanced kidney cancer, called PSMA PET/CT. This imaging changed the management plan in 49% of the patients. PSMA PET/CT detected metastases in 84% of our patients and detected more metastases than computed tomography imaging in 25%.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectClear cell histologyen
dc.subjectImpacten
dc.subjectKidney canceren
dc.subjectManagement changeen
dc.subjectMetastasis-directed therapyen
dc.subjectMolecular imagingen
dc.subjectOligometastaticen
dc.subjectPositron emission tomography/computed tomographyen
dc.subjectProstate-specific membrane antigenen
dc.subjectRenal cell carcinomaen
dc.titleImpact of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Management of Oligometastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleEuropean Urology Open Scienceen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMedical Education, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAlfred Health Radiation Oncology, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSurgery (University of Melbourne)en
dc.identifier.affiliationUrology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Melbourne Hospital Clinical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationClinical Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationUrologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, St. Vincent's Health, Fitzroy, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Instituteen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.001en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid36185587-
local.name.researcherEapen, Renu S
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptRadiation Oncology-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

46
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.