Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30946
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTran, Vy-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Anne-
dc.contributor.authorSutherland, Tom-
dc.contributor.authorTaubman, Kim-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Su-Faye-
dc.contributor.authorLenaghan, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorSethi, Kapil-
dc.contributor.authorCorcoran, Niall M-
dc.contributor.authorLawrentschuk, Nathan-
dc.contributor.authorWoo, H-
dc.contributor.authorTarlinton, Lisa-
dc.contributor.authorBolton, Damien M-
dc.contributor.authorSpelman, Tim-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Lauren-
dc.contributor.authorBooth, Russell-
dc.contributor.authorHegarty, Justin-
dc.contributor.authorPerry, Elisa-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Lih-Ming-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-30T06:17:53Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-30T06:17:53Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09-19-
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open 2022-09-19; 12(9): e061815en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30946-
dc.description.abstractProstate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) has emerged as valuable imaging to assessing metastatic disease in prostate malignancy. However, there has been limited studies exploring the utility PSMA-PET as primary imaging assessing for index lesions prior to biopsy. The primary objective of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of 18-fluorine PSMA (18F DCFPyL PSMA) PET scans to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) to detect primary prostate cancer at prostate biopsy. The PEDAL trial is a multicentre, prospective, single-arm, paired comparison, non-randomised phase III trial in subjects considered for diagnostic prostate biopsy. Subjects who are eligible for a diagnostic mpMRI prostate will undergo additional same-day 18 F DCFPyl PSMA PET/CT of the chest, abdomen and pelvis. Software coregistration of the mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT images will be performed. The reporting of the mpMRI prostate, PSMA-PET/CT and PSMA PET/MRI coregistration will be performed blinded. The diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT alone, and in combination with mpMRI, to detect prostate cancer will be assessed. Histopathology at prostate biopsy will be used as the reference standard. Sample size calculations estimate that 240 subjects will need to be recruited to demonstrate 20% superiority of PSMA-PET/CT. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the combination of mpMRI prostate and PSMA PET/CT compared with targeted and systematic prostate biopsy will be evaluated. It is hypothesised that PSMA PET/CT combined with mpMRI prostate will have improved diagnostic accuracy compared with mpMRI prostate alone for detection of prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men, resulting in a significant impact on patient management. This study was approved by the independent Human Research Ethics Committee. Results will be published in peer-reviewed medical journals with eligible investigators will significantly contribute. ACTRN12620000261910.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance imagingen
dc.subjectnuclear radiologyen
dc.subjectprostate diseaseen
dc.titlePEDAL protocol: a prospective single-arm paired comparison of multiparametric MRI and 18F-DCPFyl PSMA PET/CT to diagnose prostate cancer.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMJ Openen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital City Campus, Parkville, Victoria,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Wahroonga, New South Wales,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSan Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Wahroonga, New South Wales,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationUrologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia. Department of Urology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medical Imaging, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria,Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPacific Radiology Christchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand..en
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061815en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcidhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-7786-0605en
dc.identifier.pubmedid36123093
local.name.researcherBolton, Damien M
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.