Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30872
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQu, Liang G-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Garson-
dc.contributor.authorGani, Johan-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-20T06:46:06Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-20T06:46:06Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationResearch and Reports in Urology 2022; 14: 297-303en_US
dc.identifier.issn2253-2447
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30872-
dc.description.abstractRecommendations for alpha-blockers have shifted in the conservative management of ureteral stones. It is unknown whether real-life practices regarding alpha-blocker prescriptions reflect updates in evidence. This study aimed to characterise alpha-blocker prescriptions for conservatively managed ureteral stones and relate this to recent literature. This was a retrospective audit, 01/01/2014 to 01/01/2019, of emergency acute renal colic presentations. Patients were included if they had a confirmed ureteral stone and were conservatively managed. The rates of alpha-blocker prescriptions were analysed using interrupted time-series analyses. May 2015 was selected as the cut-point to analyse before and after trend lines. Results were stratified by stone size and location. Tamsulosin and prazosin prescriptions were also compared. This study included 2163 presentations: 70.4% were stones ≤5 mm and 61.4% were proximal stones. Altogether, 24.7% of presentations were prescribed alpha-blockers. There was a fall in alpha-blocker prescription rates from before to after May 2015, regardless of stone size or location (p < 0.001). Since May 2015, however, there was a monthly rate increase of 0.5% for patients with stones >5mm. This study demonstrated a significant shift in rates of alpha-blocker prescriptions, possibly related to the influence of updates in available high-quality evidence.en_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectadrenergic alpha-antagonistsen_US
dc.subjectemergency medicineen_US
dc.subjectrenal colicen_US
dc.subjectureteric calculusen_US
dc.titleAlpha-Blocker Prescribing Trends for Ureteral Stones: A Single-Centre Study.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleResearch and Reports in Urologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationUrologyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.en_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Urology, Western Health, Footscray, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/RRU.S372208en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5710-1983en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-2241-6635en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1666-0148en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid36060307
local.name.researcherChan, Garson
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
crisitem.author.deptUrology-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.