Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30312
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHyatt, Amelia-
dc.contributor.authorLipson-Smith, Ruby-
dc.contributor.authorGough, Karla-
dc.contributor.authorButow, Phyllis-
dc.contributor.authorJefford, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorHack, Thomas F-
dc.contributor.authorHale, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorZucchi, Emiliano-
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Shane-
dc.contributor.authorOzolins, Uldis-
dc.contributor.authorSchofield, Penelope-
dc.date2022-08-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-23T00:37:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-23T00:37:49Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-28-
dc.identifier.citationContemporary clinical trials communications 2022; 28: 100932en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30312-
dc.description.abstractOncology patients who are migrants or refugees face worse outcomes due to language and communication barriers impacting care. Interventions such as consultation audio-recordings and question prompt lists may prove beneficial in mediating communication challenges. However, designing robust research inclusive of patients who do not speak English is challenging. This study therefore aimed to: a) pilot test and assess the appropriateness of the proposed research design and methods for engaging migrant populations, and b) determine whether a multi-site RCT efficacy assessment of the communication intervention utilising these methods is feasible. This study is a mixed-methods parallel-group, randomised controlled feasibility pilot trial. Feasibility outcomes comprised assessment of: i) screening and recruitment processes, ii) design and procedures, and iii) research time and costing. The communication intervention comprised audio-recordings of a key medical consultation with an interpreter, and question prompt lists and cancer information translated into Arabic, Greek, Traditional, and Simplified Chinese. Assessment of feasibility parameters revealed that despite barriers, methods utilised in this study supported the inclusion of migrant oncology patients in research. A future multi-site RCT efficacy assessment of the INFORM communication intervention using these methods is feasible if recommendations to strengthen screening and recruitment are adopted. Importantly, hiring of bilingual research assistants, and engagement with community and consumer advocates is essential. Early involvement of clinical and interpreting staff as key stakeholders is likewise recommended. Results from this feasibility RCT help us better understand and overcome the challenges and misconceptions about including migrant patients in clinical research.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectCanceren
dc.subjectClinicial Trialsen
dc.subjectCommunicationen
dc.subjectConsultation audio-recordingen
dc.subjectConsultation recordingen
dc.subjectCulturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD)en
dc.subjectMigrantsen
dc.subjectQuestion prompt listsen
dc.titleIncluding migrant oncology patients in research: A multisite pilot randomised controlled trial testing consultation audio-recordings and question prompt lists.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleContemporary clinical trials communicationsen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, Northern Health, Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationPsycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Iverson Health Innovation Research Institute, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationTranscultural & Language Services, Northern Health, Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Humanities and Languages, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Health Services Research and Implementation Science, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Healthen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre of Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationCollege of Nursing, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada..en
dc.identifier.affiliationPsychosocial Oncology and Cancer Nursing Research, St. Boniface Research Centre, Winnipeg, Canada..en
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35677588/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100932en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8307-3667en
dc.identifier.pubmedid35677588
local.name.researcherWhite, Shane
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

64
checked on Jan 25, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.