Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30171
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHong, Jason T-
dc.contributor.authorKutaiba, Numan-
dc.contributor.authorParameswaran, Bimal-
dc.contributor.authorJames, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorHong, Alton-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Suat Chin-
dc.contributor.authorAn, Vinna-
dc.date2022-01-24-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-23T00:26:19Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-23T00:26:19Z-
dc.date.issued2022-05-
dc.identifier.citationANZ Journal of Surgery 2022; 92(5): 1085-1090en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30171-
dc.description.abstractComputed tomography (CT), computed tomography enterography (CTE) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) are commonly used pre-operatively in surgical planning in Crohn's Disease (CD). The findings on CT, CTE and MRE may not, however, correlate with operative findings. This study aims to establish the sensitivity of these imaging modalities and analyse radiologist inter-rater reliability by comparing imaging findings of strictures, fistulas and abscesses with intra-operative findings. A retrospective review of CD patients who had either CT, CTE and/or MRE imaging and CD related surgical intervention at a public health service from 2010 to 2019 inclusive. The number and locations of strictures, fistulas and abscesses on pre-operative original radiology reports (OR) were recorded. Subsequently, all scans were re-read by two specialist abdominal radiologists and consensus recorded (SR). Lesions recorded from both OR and SR were compared to those found intra-operatively. Eighty-three patients were included. For strictures, sensitivity was 67%, 74% and 79% for OR and 88%, 71% and 87% for SR for CT, CTE and MRE respectively. The frequency of fistulas and abscesses were small hence a conclusion could not be drawn. The level of agreement between radiologists ranged from 44% to 82% for strictures and 64 to 100% for fistulas and abscesses across all three imaging modalities. CT and MRE have similarly high sensitivities for the identification of strictures pre-operatively when read by specialist radiologists. Inter-rater reliability calculations found similar agreement levels between specialist radiologists and between OR and SR for strictures, fistulas and abscesses across CT, CTE and MRE.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectCT enterographyen
dc.subjectCrohn's diseaseen
dc.subjectcomputed tomographyen
dc.subjectmagnetic resonance enterographyen
dc.titleSensitivity of pre-operative imaging and radiologist inter-rater reliability in detecting lesions in Crohn's disease.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleANZ journal of surgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationRadiology..en
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Information Technology, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Radiology (Imaging Associates), Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia..en
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35068030/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ans.17477en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0514-3532en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0025-4620en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4440-654Xen
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6291-8306en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4627-9847en
dc.identifier.pubmedid35068030-
local.name.researcherKutaiba, Numan
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptRadiology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

50
checked on Mar 15, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.