Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30039
Title: Upper urinary tract pressures in endourology: A systematic review of range, variables and implications.
Austin Authors: Croghan, Stefanie M;Skolarikos, Andreas;Jack, Gregory S ;Manecksha, Rustom P;Walsh, Michael T;O'Brien, Fergal J;Davis, Niall F
Affiliation: Urology
Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland
Department of Urology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Department of Surgery, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland
Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Ireland
Tissue Engineering Research Group, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
Department of Urology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin
Department of Urology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland
Chairman, European Association of Urology Urolithiasis guidelines
Department of Urology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
School of Engineering, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Ireland
Department of Urology, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Issue Date: Mar-2023
Date: 2022
Publication information: BJU International 2023; 131(3)
Abstract: To systematically review the literature, ascertaining upper tract pressures generated during endourology, relevant influencing variables and clinical implications. A systematic review of MEDLINE/Scopus/Cochrane databases was performed by two authors independently (SC,ND). Studies reporting ureteric or intrarenal pressures during semi-rigid ureteroscopy(URS)/flexible ureterorenoscopy(FURS)/percutaneous nephrolithotomy(PCNL)/miniaturised PCNL(mPCNL);1950-2021 were identified. Both in vitro and in vivo studies were considered for inclusion. Findings were independently screened for eligibility based on content, with disagreements resolved by author consensus. Data were assessed for bias and compiled based upon predefined variables. Fifty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Mean IRP appears to frequently exceed a previously proposed threshold of 40cmH2 O. Semi-rigid ureteroscopy with low-pressure irrigation (gravity <1m) resulted in a wide mean IRP range (lowest reported 6.9 cmH2 O, highest mean 149.5±6.2cmH2 O; animal models). FURS without an ureteric access sheath (UAS) was associated with lowest mean IRP 47.6±4.1, with maximum peak IRP 557.4cmH2 O (in vivo human data). UAS placement significantly reduces IRP during FURS; however does not guarantee pressure control with hand-operated pump/syringe irrigation. Miniaturisation of PCNL sheaths is associated with increased IRP; however a wide mean human IRP range has been recorded with both mPCNL (lowest -6.8±2.2cmH2 O(suction sheath); highest 41.2±5.3cmH2 O) and standard PCNL (lowest 6.5cmH2 O; highest 41.2cmH2 O). Use of continuous suction in mPCNL results in greater control of mean IRP, although short pressure peaks >40cmH2 O are not entirely prevented. Definitive conclusions are limited by heterogeneity in study design and results. Postoperative pain and pyrexia may be correlated with increased IRP, however few in vivo studies correlate clinical outcome with measured IRP. Intrarenal pressure generated during upper tract endoscopy often exceeds 40cmH2 O. IRP is multifactorial in origin, with contributory variables discussed. Larger, prospective human in vivo studies are required to further our understanding of IRP thresholds and clinical sequelae.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/30039
DOI: 10.1111/bju.15764
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4524-3682
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5298-1475
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9192-8362
Journal: BJU International
PubMed URL: 35485243
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35485243/
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Endourology)
Kidney
Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous
Pressure
Pyeloscopy
Treatment outcome
Ureteroscopy (+Intra-renal
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Nov 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.