Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/29613
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, David Shi Hao-
dc.contributor.authorNewbold, Ryan-
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Sean-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Enoch-
dc.contributor.authorFong, Jonathan-
dc.contributor.authorMori, Krinal-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Darren J-
dc.contributor.authorGill, Anna Sonia-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Sharon-
dc.contributor.authorJamel, Wael-
dc.contributor.authorCrowe, Amy-
dc.contributor.authorHoward, Tess-
dc.contributor.authorJain, Anshini-
dc.contributor.authorBeh, Pith Soh-
dc.contributor.authorSlevin, Maeve-
dc.contributor.authorFleming, Nicola-
dc.contributor.authorBennet, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorChung, Chi-
dc.date2022-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-31T22:49:40Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-31T22:49:40Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-22-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery : Official Journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2022; 26(7): 1495-1502en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/29613-
dc.description.abstractAbdominal visceral resections incur relatively higher rates of postoperative bleeding and venous thromboembolism (VTE). While guidelines recommend the use of perioperative chemical thromboprophylaxis, the most appropriate time for its initiation is unknown. Here, we investigated whether early (before skin closure) versus postoperative commencement of chemoprophylaxis affected VTE and bleeding rates following abdominal visceral resection. Retrospective review of all elective abdominal visceral resections undertaken between January 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019, across four tertiary-referral hospitals. Major bleeding was defined as the need for blood transfusion, reintervention, or > 20 g/L fall in hemoglobin from baseline. Clinical VTE was defined as imaging-proven symptomatic disease < 30 days post-surgery. A total of 945 cases were analyzed. Chemoprophylaxis was given early in 265 (28.0%) patients and postoperatively in 680 (72.0%) patients. Mean chemoprophylaxis exposure doses were similar between the two groups. Clinical VTE developed in 14 (1.5%) patients and was unrelated to chemoprophylaxis timing. Postoperative bleeding occurred in 71 (7.5%) patients, with 57 (80.3%) major bleeds, requiring blood transfusion in 48 (67.6%) cases and reintervention in 31 (43.7%) cases. Bleeding extended length-of-stay (median (IQR), 12 (7-27) versus 7 (5-11) days, p < 0.001). Importantly, compared to postoperative chemoprophylaxis, early administration significantly increased the risk of bleeding (10.6% versus 6.3%, RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.05-1.93, p = 0.038) and independently predicted its occurrence. The risk of bleeding following elective abdominal visceral resections is substantial and is higher than the risk of clinical VTE. Compared with early chemoprophylaxis, postoperative initiation reduces bleeding risk without an increased risk of clinical VTE.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectChemoprophylaxisen
dc.subjectLaparotomyen
dc.subjectThromboembolismen
dc.subjectTimingen
dc.titleEarly Versus Postoperative Chemical Thromboprophylaxis Is Associated with Increased Bleeding Risk Following Abdominal Visceral Resections: a Multicenter Cohort Study.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tracten
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Northern Health, 185 Cooper Street, Epping, Victoria, 3076, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationGastroenterology and Hepatologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationSurgery (University of Melbourne)en
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Box Hill Hospital, 8 Arnold Street, Box Hill, Victoria, 3128, Australia..en
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Surgery, Anaesthesia and Procedural Medicineen
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan Street, Melbourne, Victoria, 3000, Australia..en
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35318594/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11605-022-05301-4en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8936-4123en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3522-1412en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8513-2130en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-0117-0071en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5366-3049en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-0037-5238en
dc.identifier.pubmedid35318594-
local.name.researcherBeh, Pith Soh
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on Nov 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.