Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28811
Title: Systematic review and meta-analysis: evaluating response to empiric anti-TNF dose intensification for secondary loss of response in Crohn's disease.
Austin Authors: Srinivasan, Ashish ;Gilmore, Robert B ;van Langenberg, Daniel;De Cruz, Peter P 
Affiliation: Gastroenterology and Hepatology..
Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia..
Issue Date: 2-Feb-2022
Date: 2022
Publication information: Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology 2022; 15: 17562848211070940
Abstract: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) dose intensification represents an effective method of overcoming secondary loss of response (LOR); however, a subset of patients may not respond (tertiary non-response), or fail to demonstrate durable response (tertiary LOR) to intensified dosing. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate these outcomes to determine the clinical effectiveness of empiric dose intensification in Crohn's disease. Multiple databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were interrogated to identify studies that reported outcomes following anti-TNF dose intensification to address secondary LOR in Crohn's disease. Studies that used anti-TNF levels as the primary basis for dose intensification were excluded. Studies that reported (1) tertiary response and tertiary non-response within 6 months or (2) tertiary response and tertiary LOR beyond 6 months, were pooled using a random effects model with risk ratio (RR) derived, quantifying the effect of each comparison. Twenty-six studies reported outcomes following anti-TNF dose intensification to address secondary LOR. Short-term response within 12 weeks of any dose-intensification strategy was 33-90%, while sustained response (⩾48 weeks) was achieved in 25-85%. Tertiary non-response occurred in up to 45% of intensified patients within 6 months of anti-TNF dose intensification, while tertiary LOR beyond 6 months occurred in up to 64% of patients. Tertiary response was more likely than tertiary non-response within 6 months (RR 2.58, 95% CI (1.76, 3.79), I 2 = 82%, 12 studies), while sustained response beyond 6 months compared to tertiary LOR (RR 1.10 (0.75, 1.61) I 2 = 85%, 7 studies) was less convincing. Although anti-TNF dose intensification is clinically effective in patients with Crohn's disease, particularly within the first 6 months, a proportion of patients will fail to demonstrate short-term and/or sustained clinical response. Hence, clinical reassessment following anti-TNF dose intensification, particularly beyond 6 months, remains important to differentiate between effective and ineffective dose-intensification strategies.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28811
DOI: 10.1177/17562848211070940
ORCID: 0000-0001-5952-1570
0000-0002-3399-7236
Journal: Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology
PubMed URL: 35126667
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35126667/
ISSN: 1756-283X
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Crohn’s disease
adalimumab
anti-TNF
dose intensification
infliximab, loss of response
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Nov 15, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.