Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28788
Title: Design and Preliminary Results of Sensing and Detection for an Extravascular Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.
Austin Authors: Swerdlow, Charles D;Zhang, Xusheng;Sawchuk, Robert;Greenhut, Saul;Grinberg, Yanina;Liu, Yuanzhen;Crozier, Ian;O'Donnell, David ;Kotschet, Emily;Haqqani, Haris
Affiliation: Cardiology
Department of Cardiac Rhythm Services, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Department of Cardiology, Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Smidt Heart Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA. Electronic address: swerdlow@ucla.edu..
Department of Cardiology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand..
Medtronic plc, Mounds View, Minnesota, USA
Issue Date: Nov-2021
Date: 2021-04-28
Publication information: JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology 2021; 7(11): 1387-1399
Abstract: This study reports the sensing and arrhythmia detection performance of a novel extravascular (EV) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in a first-in-human pilot study. The EV ICD lead is implanted in the substernal space, resulting in novel sensing and detection challenges. It uses a programmable sensing profile with new or modified discrimination of oversensing and of ventricular tachycardia (VT) from supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). Electrograms were post-processed from induced ventricular fibrillation (VF) at implant to determine virtual detection times for each programmable sensitivity and the least-sensitive safe sensitivity setting. In ambulatory patients, programmed sensitivity provided at least a twofold safety margin for detecting induced VF. Noise discrimination was stress tested, and the effects of source, posture, and lead maturation were determined on electrogram amplitude. Telemetry Holter monitors were used to quantify undersensing and oversensing. In 20 patients at implant, the least-sensitive safe sensitivity for VF detection ranged from 0.1 to 0.6 mV. Seventeen patients were followed up for a total of 16.6 patient-years. Electrogram amplitudes were stable over time, but there were significant differences among postures and sensing vectors. For the primary sensing vector, the weighted oversensing and undersensing rates were 1.03% and 0.40% respectively, on a beat-to-beat basis. Oversensing did not cause inappropriate therapy in patients with in situ leads. Oversensing discriminators withheld VF detection in 4 of 5 spontaneous, sustained oversensed episodes. SVT-VT discriminators correctly classified 93% of 128 sustained SVTs in monitor zones. In the EV ICD pilot study, oversensing did not cause inappropriate therapy during ambulatory follow-up of stable leads.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28788
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.03.004
Journal: JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology
PubMed URL: 33933410
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33933410/
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: defibrillator
detection
extravascular
sensing
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on Nov 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.