Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28703
Title: Co-Designing a New Yoga-Based Mindfulness Intervention for Survivors of Stroke: A Formative Evaluation.
Austin Authors: Thayabaranathan, Tharshanah;Immink, Maarten A;Hillier, Susan;Stolwyk, Rene;Andrew, Nadine E;Stevens, Philip;Kilkenny, Monique F;Gee, Emma;Carey, Leeanne M ;Brodtmann, Amy ;Bernhardt, Julie;Thrift, Amanda G;Cadilhac, Dominique A
Affiliation: The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health..
NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia..
College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA 5042, Australia..
IIMPACT, Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia..
Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia..
School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia..
Peninsula Clinical School, Monash University, Frankston, VIC 3199, Australia..
Consultant, Mooreville, TAS 7321, Australia..
Survivor of Stroke, Inspirational and Motivational Speaker, Cotham, VIC 3101, Australia..
Issue Date: 21-Dec-2021
Date: 2021
Publication information: Neurology international 2021; 14(1): 1-10
Abstract: Movement-based mindfulness interventions (MBI) are complex, multi-component interventions for which the design process is rarely reported. For people with stroke, emerging evidence suggests benefits, but mainstream programs are generally unsuitable. We aimed to describe the processes involved and to conduct a formative evaluation of the development of a novel yoga-based MBI designed for survivors of stroke. We used the Medical Research Council complex interventions framework and principles of co-design. We purposefully approached health professionals and consumers to establish an advisory committee for developing the intervention. Members collaborated and iteratively reviewed the design and content of the program, formatted into a training manual. Four external yoga teachers independently reviewed the program. Formative evaluation included review of multiple data sources and documentation (e.g., formal meeting minutes, focus group discussions, researcher observations). The data were synthesized using inductive thematic analysis. Three broad themes emerged: (a) MBI content and terminology; (b) manual design and readability; and (c) barriers and enablers to deliver the intervention. Various perspectives and feedback on essential components guided finalizing the program. The design phase of a novel yoga-based MBI was strengthened by interdisciplinary, consumer contributions and peer review. The 12-week intervention is ready for testing among survivors of stroke.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28703
DOI: 10.3390/neurolint14010001
ORCID: 0000-0003-2504-7772
0000-0002-4652-0090
0000-0002-6071-6137
0000-0002-4975-3332
0000-0002-4846-2840
0000-0002-3375-287X
0000-0001-6376-8613
0000-0001-9466-2862
0000-0002-2787-8484
0000-0001-8533-4170
0000-0001-8162-682X
Journal: Neurology international
PubMed URL: 35076591
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35076591/
ISSN: 2035-8385
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: co-design
community-based intervention
evaluation research
qualitative evaluation
stakeholder engagement
stroke
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Nov 7, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.