Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28694
Title: Teaching Radial Endobronchial Ultrasound with a Three-Dimensional-printed Radial Ultrasound Model.
Austin Authors: Ridgers, Anna;Li, Jasun ;Coles-Black, Jasamine ;Jiang, Michael ;Chen, Gordon ;Chuen, Jason ;McDonald, Christine F ;Hepworth, Graham;Steinfort, Daniel P;Irving, Louis B;Wallbridge, Peter D ;Jennings, Barton R;Nguyen, Phan;Leong, Tracy L 
Affiliation: Institute for Breathing and Sleep
Respiratory and Sleep Medicine
Vascular Surgery
Surgery
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Department of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
3dMedLab
Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
Issue Date: 22-Nov-2021
Date: 2021-12
Publication information: ATS Scholar 2021; 2(4): 606-619
Abstract: Peripheral pulmonary lesion (PPL) incidence is rising because of increased chest imaging sensitivity and frequency. For PPLs suspicious for lung cancer, current clinical guidelines recommend tissue diagnosis. Radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS) is a bronchoscopic technique used for this purpose. It has been observed that diagnostic yield is impacted by the ability to accurately manipulate the radial probe. However, such skills can be acquired, in part, from simulation training. Three-dimensional (3D) printing has been used to produce training simulators for standard bronchoscopy but has not been specifically used to develop similar tools for R-EBUS. We report the development of a novel ultrasound-compatible, anatomically accurate 3D-printed R-EBUS simulator and evaluation of its utility as a training tool. Computed tomography images were used to develop 3D-printed airway models with ultrasound-compatible PPLs of "low" and "high" technical difficulty. Twenty-one participants were allocated to two groups matched for prior R-EBUS experience. The intervention group received 15 minutes to pretrain R-EBUS using a 3D-printed model, whereas the nonintervention group did not. Both groups then performed R-EBUS on 3D-printed models and were evaluated using a specifically developed assessment tool. For the "low-difficulty" model, the intervention group achieved a higher score (21.5 ± 2.02) than the nonintervention group (17.1 ± 5.7), reflecting 26% improvement in performance (P = 0.03). For the "high-difficulty" model, the intervention group scored 20.2 ± 4.21 versus 13.3 ± 7.36, corresponding to 52% improvement in performance (P = 0.02). Participants derived benefit from pretraining with the 3D-printed model, regardless of prior experience level. 3D-printing can be used to develop simulators for R-EBUS education. Training using these models significantly improves procedural performance and is effective in both novice and experienced trainees.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28694
DOI: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0152OC
ORCID: 0000-0002-5113-0302
0000-0002-8358-3779
0000-0002-0955-5446
0000-0001-6481-3391
0000-0002-1950-1505
Journal: ATS Scholar
PubMed URL: 35083464
PubMed URL: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35083464/
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: 3D
radial endobronchial ultrasound
simulation
training
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

64
checked on Dec 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.