Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28327
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSinclair, Nicholas C-
dc.contributor.authorMcDermott, Hugh J-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Wee-Lih-
dc.contributor.authorXu, San San-
dc.contributor.authorAcevedo, Nicola-
dc.contributor.authorBegg, Angus-
dc.contributor.authorPerera, Thushara-
dc.contributor.authorThevathasan, Wesley-
dc.contributor.authorBulluss, Kristian J-
dc.date2021-12-10-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-14T03:12:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-14T03:12:44Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-10-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Neurosurgery 2021; online first: 10 Decemberen
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/28327-
dc.description.abstractDeep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is commonly performed with the patient awake to facilitate assessments of electrode positioning. However, awake neurosurgery can be a barrier to patients receiving DBS. Electrode implantation can be performed with the patient under general anesthesia (GA) using intraoperative imaging, although such techniques are not widely available. Electrophysiological features can also aid in the identification of target neural regions and provide functional evidence of electrode placement. Here we assess the presence and positional variation under GA of spontaneous beta and high-frequency oscillation (HFO) activity, and evoked resonant neural activity (ERNA), a novel evoked response localized to the subthalamic nucleus. ERNA, beta, and HFO were intraoperatively recorded from DBS leads comprising four individual electrodes immediately after bilateral awake implantation into the subthalamic nucleus of 21 patients with Parkinson's disease (42 hemispheres) and after subsequent GA induction deep enough to perform pulse generator implantation. The main anesthetic agent was either propofol (10 patients) or sevoflurane (11 patients). GA reduced the amplitude of ERNA, beta, and HFO activity (p < 0.001); however, ERNA amplitudes remained large in comparison to spontaneous local field potentials. Notably, a moderately strong correlation between awake ERNA amplitude and electrode distance to an "ideal" therapeutic target within dorsal STN was preserved under GA (awake: ρ = -0.73, adjusted p value [padj] < 0.001; GA: ρ = -0.69, padj < 0.001). In contrast, correlations were diminished under GA for beta (awake: ρ = -0.45, padj < 0.001; GA: ρ = -0.13, padj = 0.12) and HFO (awake: ρ = -0.69, padj < 0.001; GA: ρ = -0.33, padj < 0.001). The largest ERNA occurred at the same electrode (awake vs GA) for 35/42 hemispheres (83.3%) and corresponded closely to the electrode selected by the clinician for chronic therapy at 12 months (awake ERNA 77.5%, GA ERNA 82.5%). The largest beta amplitude occurred at the same electrode (awake vs GA) for only 17/42 (40.5%) hemispheres and 21/42 (50%) for HFO. The electrode measuring the largest awake beta and HFO amplitudes corresponded to the electrode selected by the clinician for chronic therapy at 12 months in 60% and 70% of hemispheres, respectively. However, this correspondence diminished substantially under GA (beta 20%, HFO 35%). ERNA is a robust electrophysiological signal localized to the dorsal subthalamic nucleus subregion that is largely preserved under GA, indicating it could feasibly guide electrode implantation, either alone or in complementary use with existing methods.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectbetaen
dc.subjectdeep brain stimulationen
dc.subjectevoked resonant neural activityen
dc.subjectfunctional neurosurgeryen
dc.subjectgeneral anesthesiaen
dc.subjecthigh-frequency oscillationsen
dc.subjectsubthalamic nucleusen
dc.titleElectrically evoked and spontaneous neural activity in the subthalamic nucleus under general anesthesia.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Neurosurgeryen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkvilleen
dc.identifier.affiliationMedical Bionics Department, The University of Melbourne, East Melbourneen
dc.identifier.affiliationBionics Institute, East Melbourneen
dc.identifier.affiliationNeurologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationBionics Institute, East Melbourneen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Neurosurgery, St. Vincent's and Austin Hospitals, Melbourneen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34891136/en
dc.identifier.doi10.3171/2021.8.JNS204225en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid34891136
local.name.researcherBulluss, Kristian J
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptMolecular Imaging and Therapy-
crisitem.author.deptNeurosurgery-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

26
checked on Sep 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.