Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27980
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeslie, Kate-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Matthew T V-
dc.contributor.authorDarvall, Jai N-
dc.contributor.authorDe Silva, Anurika P-
dc.contributor.authorBraat, Sabine-
dc.contributor.authorDevlin, Nancy J-
dc.contributor.authorPeyton, Philip J-
dc.contributor.authorRadnor, Jade-
dc.contributor.authorLam, Carmen K M-
dc.contributor.authorSidiropoulos, Sofia-
dc.contributor.authorStory, David A-
dc.date2021-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-16T02:50:48Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-16T02:50:48Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-09-
dc.identifier.citationPilot and feasibility studies 2021; 7(1): 200en
dc.identifier.issn2055-5784
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27980-
dc.description.abstractSugammadex reduces residual neuromuscular blockade after anaesthesia, potentially preventing postoperative pulmonary complications. However, definitive evidence is lacking. We therefore conducted a feasibility and pilot trial for a large randomised controlled trial of sugammadex, neostigmine, and postoperative pulmonary complications. Patients aged ≥40 years having elective or expedited abdominal or intrathoracic surgery were recruited in Australia and Hong Kong. Perioperative care was at the discretion of clinicians, except for the use of rocuronium and/or vecuronium for neuromuscular blockade and the randomised intervention (sugammadex or neostigmine) for reversal. Feasibility measurements included recruitment, crossover, acceptability, completeness, and workload. Trial coordinator feedback was systematically sought. Patient-reported quality of life was measured using the EQ-5D-5L score. The primary pilot outcome was the incidence of new pulmonary complications up to hospital discharge (or postoperative day 7 if still in hospital). Among 150 eligible patients, 120 consented to participate (recruitment rate 80%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 73 to 86%). The randomised intervention was administered without crossover to 115 of 117 patients who received reversal (98%, 95% CI 94 to 100%). The protocol was acceptable or highly acceptable to the anaesthetist in 108 of 116 cases (93%, 95% CI 87 to 97%; missing = 4). Four patients of the 120 patients were lost to follow-up at 3 months (3.3%, 95% CI 0.9 to 8.3%). Case report forms were complete at 3 months for all remaining patients. The median time to complete trial processes was 3.5 h (range 2.5-4.5 h). Trial coordinators reported no barriers to trial processes. Patients were aged 64 (standard deviation 11) years, 70 (58%) were male and 50 (42%) were female, and planned surgeries were thoracic (23 [19%]), upper abdominal (41 [34%]), and lower abdominal (56 [47%]). The primary outcome was observed in 5 (8.5%) of the 59 sugammadex patients and 5 (8.2%) of the 61 neostigmine patients (odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.28 to 3.67). A large international randomised controlled trial of sugammadex, neostigmine and postoperative pulmonary complications in adult patients having abdominal and intrathoracic surgery, including collection of cost-effectiveness evidence for Health Technology Appraisal, is feasible. Prospectively registered at the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12620001313921 ) on December 7, 2020. www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=380645&isReview=true .en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectAtelectasisen
dc.subjectNeostigmineen
dc.subjectNeuromuscular blockadeen
dc.subjectPneumoniaen
dc.subjectSugammadexen
dc.titleSugammadex, neostigmine and postoperative pulmonary complications: an international randomised feasibility and pilot trial.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitlePilot and Feasibility Studiesen
dc.identifier.affiliationHealth Economics Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Operating Room Services, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of Chinaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMethods and Implementation Support for Clinical and Health (MISCH) Research Hub, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAnaesthesiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Northeast Health Wangaratta, Wangaratta, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of Chinaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia and Operating Room Services, Tuen Mun Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of Chinaen
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34753515/en
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40814-021-00942-9en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8512-3517en
dc.identifier.pubmedid34753515
local.name.researcherPeyton, Philip J
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Jul 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.