Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27849
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLin, Y H-
dc.contributor.authorOng, W L-
dc.contributor.authorTacey, M-
dc.contributor.authorBolton, D-
dc.contributor.authorTan, A-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Y-
dc.contributor.authorCham, C W-
dc.contributor.authorHo, H-
dc.contributor.authorGuerrieri, M-
dc.contributor.authorForoudi, F-
dc.contributor.authorJoon, D Lim-
dc.contributor.authorMcMillan, K-
dc.contributor.authorKoufogiannis, G-
dc.contributor.authorManohar, P-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, M-
dc.contributor.authorPham, Cecilia-
dc.contributor.authorChao, M-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T00:34:57Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T00:34:57Z-
dc.date.issued2021-11-01-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 2021; 111(3S): 283en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27849-
dc.description.abstractTo report on rectal dosimetry and toxicity outcomes in men with prostate cancer (PCa) treated with I125 low-dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) with or without hydrogel (HS) or hyaluronic acid (HA) rectal spacer (RS) insertion. The working hypothesis is the increased retroprostatic distance achieved from RS insertion results in reduced rectal dosimetry and subsequent reduction in rectal toxicity outcomes. Seventy consecutive men treated with LDR-BT between December 2017 and July 2019 were included in this study, twenty-eight (40%) men had RS insertion according to the preference of the referring urologist, compared to a group of forty-two men (60%) without RS. Descriptive statistics were used to compare the RS safety, dosimetric effects on organs at risk (rectum and urethra), as well as gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities (assessed using the CTCAEv4) between the two groups. The mean prostate-rectal separation with RS at mid prostate was 9.9mm (SD 2.8mm). There were no post-operative complications for RS insertion. There was significantly reduced rectal dosimetry in RS group vs non-RS group, the median RV100 was 0cc (IQR = 0-0.0cc) vs 0.4cc (IQR = 0.1-1.1cc) (P < 0.001) respectively. Mean rectal D1cc and D2cc were 52.4% vs 84.2% (P < 0.001) and 45.7% vs. 70.0% (P < 0.001) for RS and non-RS group respectively. There were no discernible differences in the mean urethral D20, D5, and D1. There were significantly less ≥ grade 1 acute and late GI toxicities in the RS group when compared to the non-RS group (0% vs 24% P = 0.004 for acute GI toxicity: 4% vs 33%, P = 0.003 for late GI toxicity). Strong association remained for RS with late GI toxicity (odds ratios < 0.2) even after accounting for the confounding effects of post-implant RV100, D1cc and D2cc. Insertion of RS in men treated with LDR-BT is safe and results in significantly lower values in rectal dosimetry. The reduction in rectal dosimetry with RS insertion translates into significantly reduced rates of acute and late GI toxicities.en_US
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleImpact of Hydrogel and Hyaluronic Acid Rectal Spacer on Rectal Dosimetry and Toxicity in Low-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Patient Outcomes.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physicsen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationGenesis Care, Ringwood, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationKnox Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationRingwood Private Hospital, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Valley Private Hospital, Mulgrave, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Healthen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centreen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Bays Hospital, Mornington, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Bays Hospital, Melbourne, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationGenesis Cancer Care, Melbourne, VIC, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationGenesis Care, Melbourne, VIC, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash University- Eastern Health Clinical School, Clayton, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.907en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid34701089
local.name.researcherPham, Cecilia
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptGastroenterology and Hepatology-
crisitem.author.deptVictorian Liver Transplant Unit-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Jan 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.