Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27299
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSubramaniam, Ashwin-
dc.contributor.authorPonnapa Reddy, Mallikarjuna-
dc.contributor.authorKadam, Umesh-
dc.contributor.authorZubarev, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorLim, Zheng-
dc.contributor.authorAnstey, Chris-
dc.contributor.authorBihari, Shailesh-
dc.contributor.authorHaji, Jumana-
dc.contributor.authorLuo, Jinghang-
dc.contributor.authorMitra, Saikat-
dc.contributor.authorRamanathan, Kollengode-
dc.contributor.authorRajamani, Arvind-
dc.contributor.authorRubulotta, Francesca-
dc.contributor.authorSvensk, Erik-
dc.contributor.authorShekar, Kiran-
dc.date2021-07-09-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-23T05:59:04Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-23T05:59:04Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-
dc.identifier.citationAustralian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses 2022; 35(4): 415-423en
dc.identifier.issn1036-7314-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/27299-
dc.description.abstractClinical guidelines on infection control strategies in healthcare workers (HCWs) play an important role in protecting them during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic. Poorly constructed guidelines that are incomprehensive and/or ambiguous may compromise HCWs' safety. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a tool to appraise guidelines on infection control strategies in HCWs based on the guidelines published early in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. A three-stage, web-based, Delphi consensus-building process among a panel of diverse HCWs and healthcare managers was performed. The tool was validated by appraising 40 international, specialty-specific, and procedure-specific guidelines along with national guidelines from countries with a wide range of gross national income. Overall consensus (≥75%) was reached at the end of three rounds for all six domains included in the tool. The Delphi panel recommended an ideal infection control guideline should encompass six domains: general characteristics (domain 1), engineering recommendations (domain 2), personal protective equipment (PPE) use (domain 3), and administrative aspects (domain 4-6) of infection control. The appraisal tool performed well across the six domains, and the inter-rater agreement was excellent for the 40 guidelines. All included guidelines performed relatively better in domains 1-3 than in domains 4-6, and this was more evident in guidelines originating from lower income countries. The guideline appraisal tool was robust and easy to use. Engineering recommendations aspects of infection control, administrative measures that promote optimal PPE use, and HCW wellbeing were generally lacking in assessed guidelines. This tool may enable health systems to adopt high-quality HCW infection control guidelines during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic and may also provide a framework for future guideline development.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectGuideline appraisal toolen
dc.subjectHealthcare workersen
dc.subjectInfection control guidelinesen
dc.subjectPPE guidelinesen
dc.subjectPandemicen
dc.subjectSARS-CoV-2en
dc.titleDevelopment and validation of a tool to appraise guidelines on SARS-CoV-2 infection control strategies in healthcare workers.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleAustralian Critical Careen
dc.identifier.affiliationNational University Hospital, Singaporeen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Sydney, Nepean Clinical School and Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singaporeen
dc.identifier.affiliationCasey Monash Hospital, Berwick, VIC, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAdult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland; University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationBond University, Gold Coast, Qld, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Healthen
dc.identifier.affiliationGriffith University, University of Queensland, Qld Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationFlinders University and Flinders Medical Center, SA, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationWestern Health, VIC, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationFrankston Hospital, Frankston, VIC Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Bays Hospital, Mornington, VIC Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash University, Frankston, VIC Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationCalvary Public Hospital, ACT, Canberra, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationWerribee Mercy Hospital, Werribee, VIC, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAster CMI Hospital, Bangalore, Indiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationNational University Hospital, Singaporeen
dc.identifier.affiliationAnaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Imperial College London, London, UKen
dc.identifier.affiliationAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Sundsvall Hospital, Sundsvall, Swedenen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aucc.2021.06.015en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid34404579-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on Jan 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.