Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26010
Title: Do clinical guidelines guide clinical practice in stroke rehabilitation? An international survey of health professionals.
Austin Authors: Lynch, Elizabeth A;Connell, Louise A;Carvalho, Lilian B;Bird, Marie-Louise
Affiliation: College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Australia
East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust, Burnley General Teaching Hospital, Burnley, United Kingdom..
College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, Australia
Adelaide Nursing School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in Stroke Rehabilitation and Brain Recovery, Heidelberg, Australia
The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
Issue Date: 2-Mar-2021
Date: 2021
Publication information: Disability and Rehabilitation 2022; 44(15): 4118-4125
Abstract: To identify health professionals awareness of stroke rehabilitation guidelines, and factors perceived to influence guideline use internationally. Online survey study. Open-ended responses were thematically analysed, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Data from 833 respondents from 30 countries were included. Locally developed guidelines were available in 22 countries represented in the sample. Respondents from high-income countries were more aware of local guidelines compared with respondents from low- and middle-income countries.Local contextual factors such as management support and a culture of valuing evidence-based practice were reported to positively influence guideline use, whereas inadequate time and shortages of skilled staff inhibited the delivery of guideline-recommended care. Processes reported to improve guideline use included education, training, formation of workgroups, and audit-feedback cycles. Broader contextual factors included accountability (or lack thereof) of health professionals to deliver rehabilitation consistent with guideline recommendations. While many health professionals were aware of clinical guidelines, they identified multiple barriers to their implementation. Efforts should be made to raise awareness of local guidelines in low- and middle-income countries. More attention should be paid to addressing local contextual factors to improve guideline use internationally, going beyond traditional strategies focused on individual health professionals.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONSystems are required so people and organisations are held accountable to deliver evidence-based care in stroke rehabilitation.Locally developed stroke rehabilitation guidelines should be promoted to boost awareness of these guidelines in low- and middle-income countries.In all regions, strategies to influence or adapt to the local setting, are required to optimise guideline use.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/26010
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1891304
ORCID: 0000-0001-8756-1051
0000-0002-0629-2919
0000-0002-9803-7631
0000-0001-9642-7196
Journal: Disability and Rehabilitation
PubMed URL: 33651965
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Practice guidelines as topic
evidence-based practice
guidelines as topic
professional practice
rehabilitation
Stroke
Stroke rehabilitation
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Oct 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.