Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25485
Title: Introducing Voluntary Assisted Dying: Staff Perspectives in an Acute Hospital.
Austin Authors: Digby, Robin;McDougall, Rosalind;Gold, Michelle;Ko, Danielle ;O'Driscoll, Lisa;Bucknall, Tracey
Affiliation: Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research (QPS), Alfred Health Partnership, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Austin Health
Palliative Care
School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
Alfred Health Partnership, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: 2022
Date: 2020-11-22
Publication information: International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2022; 11(6): 777-785
Abstract: Voluntary assisted dying (VAD) was legalised in Victoria, Australia in June 2019. Physicians can now assist patients to end their lives by providing drugs for self-administration at their voluntary and competent request (or for physician administration in limited circumstances). This study investigates the opinions of clinicians on the implementation of the legislation in one Victorian hospital. This exploratory survey study was conducted at a 600-bed acute hospital in Melbourne, Australia in Jan 2019. 382 clinicians completed one or more qualitative questions. Participants commented on VAD, potential workplace challenges and staff support required. Free-text responses were analysed using inductive content analysis. Six themes: (1) Polarised views; (2) Fear of conflict; (3) Emotional burden; (4) Vulnerable patients; (5) Organisational challenges; (6) Decision-making. There were diverse views including objections to VAD for religious or ethical reasons, and whole-hearted support based on a compassionate response to suffering and the right of patients to self-determination. Participants feared conflict between colleagues, families and patients, and aggression towards staff. Clinicians called for educational and psychological support. There was concern that vulnerable patients may be coerced to opt for VAD to lessen the burden on families or the health system. Clinicians feared workloads would increase with the introduction of VAD. Patient decision-making capacity in this context must be firmly established before proceeding, and thorough assessments for depression, and optimal symptom management must be implemented before VAD is approved. A dedicated VAD team was suggested to support staff and manage VAD patients. Participants expressed polarised opinions about VAD and showed considerable anxiety about its introduction. Additional education and support are required to ensure that clinicians understand details of the legislation and their professional and personal options. Tolerance and respect for alternative viewpoints must be advocated within the organisation and more broadly.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25485
DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.216
ORCID: 0000-0001-8993-080X
0000-0002-3809-2575
0000-0001-9341-3397
0000-0001-9089-3583
Journal: International Journal of Health Policy and Management
PubMed URL: 33300768
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Acute Hospital
Assisted Suicide
Clinical Decision-Making
Clinician Perspective
End-of-Life
Euthanasia
Voluntary assisted dying
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Nov 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.