Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25451
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGrimwood, Chantal L-
dc.contributor.authorHolland, Anne E-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Christine F-
dc.contributor.authorMahal, Ajay-
dc.contributor.authorHill, Catherine J-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Annemarie L-
dc.contributor.authorCox, Narelle S-
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Rosemary P-
dc.contributor.authorNicolson, Caroline-
dc.contributor.authorO'Halloran, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorLahham, Aroub-
dc.contributor.authorGillies, Rebecca-
dc.contributor.authorBurge, Angela T-
dc.date2020-
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-06T21:53:58Z-
dc.date.available2020-12-06T21:53:58Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-23-
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research 2020; 20(1):1061en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25451-
dc.description.abstractThe optimal method to collect accurate healthcare utilisation data in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is not well established. The aim of this study was to determine feasibility and compare self-report and administrative data sources to capture health care resource use in people with COPD for 12 months following pulmonary rehabilitation. This is a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled equivalence trial comparing centre-based and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation. Healthcare utilisation data were collected for 12 months following pulmonary rehabilitation from self-report (monthly telephone questionnaires and diaries) and administrative sources (Medicare Benefits Schedule, medical records). Feasibility was assessed by the proportion of self-reports completed and accuracy was established using month-by-month and per participant comparison of self-reports with administrative data. Data were available for 145/163 eligible study participants (89%, mean age 69 (SD 9) years, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s 51 (SD 19) % predicted; n = 83 male). For 1725 months where data collection was possible, 1160 (67%) telephone questionnaires and 331 (19%) diaries were completed. Accuracy of recall varied according to type of health care encounter and self-report method, being higher for telephone questionnaire report of emergency department presentation (Kappa 0.656, p < 0.001; specificity 99%, sensitivity 59%) and hospital admission (Kappa 0.669, p < 0.001; specificity 97%, sensitivity 68%) and lower for general practitioner (Kappa 0.400, p < 0.001; specificity 62%, sensitivity 78%) and medical specialist appointments (Kappa 0.458, p < 0.001; specificity 88%, sensitivity 58%). A wide variety of non-medical encounters were reported (allied health and nursing) which were not captured in administrative data. For self-reported methods of healthcare utilisation in people with COPD following pulmonary rehabilitation, monthly telephone questionnaires were more frequently completed and more accurate than diaries. Compared to administrative records, self-reports of emergency department presentations and inpatient admissions were more accurate than for general practitioner and medical specialist appointments. NCT01423227 at clinicaltrials.gov.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectAccuracyen
dc.subjectCOPDen
dc.subjectDiaryen
dc.subjectHealth care utilisationen
dc.subjectHospitalisationen
dc.subjectMedical recordsen
dc.subjectSelf-reporten
dc.titleComparison of self-report and administrative data sources to capture health care resource use in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease following pulmonary rehabilitation.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMC Health Services Researchen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Allergy, Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Monash University, Level 6, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRespiratory and Sleep Medicineen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationLa Trobe University Clinical School, Level 4 The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPhysiotherapy, The Alfred, PO Box 315, Prahran, VIC, 3181, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Breathing and Sleepen
dc.identifier.affiliationPhysiotherapy, Monash University, Building B, McMahons Rd, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPublic Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, 3086, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPhysiotherapyen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Nossal Institute for Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12913-020-05920-0en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-5455-6467en
dc.identifier.pubmedid33228654-
local.name.researcherBurge, Angela T
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptRespiratory and Sleep Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
12913_2020_Article_5920.pdf554.66 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

76
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Download(s)

74
checked on Nov 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.