Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25375
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGrigg, Samuel E-
dc.contributor.authorZampiron, Andrea-
dc.contributor.authorAkbaridoust, Farzan-
dc.contributor.authorChandran, Dileep-
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, Natasha E-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Paul D R-
dc.contributor.authorMarusic, Ivan-
dc.contributor.authorJones, Daryl A-
dc.date2020-11-19-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-25T04:54:37Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-25T04:54:37Z-
dc.date.issued2020-05-
dc.identifier.citationInfection, Disease & Health 2021; 26(2): 104-109en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/25375-
dc.description.abstractDue to regional shortages some health services have proposed using surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap. However, there has been little assessment of the safety of this practice. Therefore, we developed our own prototypes and evaluated whether they met regulatory standards. Surgical mask prototypes were manufactured from two thickness grades of commercial sterilisation wrap. Safety was assessed in the context of regulatory standards. As it was not previously reported, we developed and performed differential pressure and synthetic blood penetration resistance experiments in accordance with official methodology. Bacterial filtration efficiency was comparable between sterilisation wrap and commercial surgical masks. Both prototypes met regulatory standards for synthetic blood resistance, whilst only our thinner mask fulfilled acceptable differential pressure ('breathability') thresholds. Acceptable barrier and breathability properties can be achieved with surgical masks produced from sterilisation wrap. Therefore, this may be a reasonable method to supplement stock if required. Unless there are shortages mandating alternatives, health-care workers should always use approved personal protective equipment.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirusen
dc.subjectInfection controlen
dc.subjectPersonal protective equipmenten
dc.subjectSterilisation wrapen
dc.subjectSurgical masksen
dc.titleAre surgical masks manufactured from sterilisation wrap safe?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleInfection, Disease & Healthen
dc.identifier.affiliationGeneral Medicineen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Monash University, Victoria, 3800, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Careen
dc.identifier.affiliationInfectious Diseasesen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Melbourne, Victoria, 3010, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.idh.2020.11.001en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid33221298
local.name.researcherGrigg, Samuel E
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptGeneral Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptInfectious Diseases-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
crisitem.author.deptInfectious Diseases-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
25375.pdf811.74 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

118
checked on Apr 17, 2025

Download(s)

88
checked on Apr 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.