Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24949
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJones, Jennifer R A-
dc.contributor.authorPuthucheary, Zudin-
dc.contributor.authorMcDonald, Luke A-
dc.contributor.authorDenehy, Linda-
dc.contributor.authorBerney, Susan C-
dc.date2020-09-15-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-02T03:26:57Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-02T03:26:57Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention 2020; 40(6): 359-369en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24949-
dc.description.abstractSurvivors of critical illness can experience persistent deficits in physical function and poor health-related quality of life and utilize significant health care resources. Short-term improvements in these outcomes have been reported following physical rehabilitation. Safety and feasibility of delivering physical rehabilitation are established; however, low physical activity levels are observed throughout the recovery of patients. We provide examples on how physical activity may be increased through interdisciplinary models of service delivery. Recently, however, there has been an emergence of large randomized controlled trials reporting no effect on long-term patient outcomes. In this review, we use a proposed theoretical construct to unpack the findings of 12 randomized controlled trials that delivered physical rehabilitation during the acute hospital stay. We describe the search for the responder according to modifiers of treatment effect for physical function, health-related quality of life, and health care utilization outcomes. In addition, we propose tailoring and timing physical rehabilitation interventions to patient subgroups that may respond differently based on their impairments and perpetuating factors that hinder recovery. We examine in detail the timing, components, and dosage of the trial intervention arms. We also describe facilitators and barriers to physical rehabilitation implementation and factors that are influential in recovery from critical illness. Through this theoretical construct, we anticipate that physical rehabilitation programs can be better tailored to the needs of survivors to deliver appropriate interventions to patients who derive greatest benefit optimally timed in their recovery trajectory.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleSearching for the Responder, Unpacking the Physical Rehabilitation Needs of Critically Ill Adults: A REVIEW.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Preventionen
dc.identifier.affiliationPhysiotherapy Department and Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAllied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Breathing and Sleepen
dc.identifier.affiliationPhysiotherapyen
dc.identifier.affiliationAdult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, Englanden
dc.identifier.affiliationWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, Englanden
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/HCR.0000000000000549en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid32956134-
local.name.researcherBerney, Susan C
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

148
checked on Jan 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.