Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24938
Title: Treatment outcomes for patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer following docetaxel for hormone-sensitive disease.
Austin Authors: Schmidt, Andrew ;Anton, Angelyn;Shapiro, Julia;Wong, Shirley;Azad, Arun;Kwan, Edmond;Spain, Lavinia;Muthusamy, Arun;Torres, Javier;Parente, Phillip;Parnis, Francis;Goh, Jeffrey;Joshua, Anthony M;Pook, David;Gibbs, Peter;Tran, Ben;Weickhardt, Andrew J 
Affiliation: Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Adelaide Cancer Centre, Adelaide, Australia
Goulburn Valley Health, Shepparton, Australia
Monash Health
Eastern Health, Melbourne, Australia
Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Australia
St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia
Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre
Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Issue Date: Feb-2021
Date: 2020-09-24
Publication information: Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology 2021; 17(1): 36-42
Abstract: Optimal treatment for newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has evolved, with many patients deriving benefit from the addition of docetaxel to androgen deprivation therapy (D-ADT). This study sought to define the therapy used and associated activity following D-ADT. Retrospective analysis of patients with mHSPC treated with one or more cycles of D-ADT who were identified from a prospectively maintained multisite prostate cancer database of patients treated in a community or academic center setting in Australia. The primary endpoint of this study was first-line time to treatment failure (1L TTF) for subsequent treatment of metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC), with secondary endpoints of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reduction >50% and time from 1L to second-line (2L) treatment initiation. A total of 93 patients received D-ADT for mHSPC, 85 (91%) had subsequent treatment for mCRPC. Median time to mCRPC (biochemical, clinical or radiographic) had been 14.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.9-16.5). 1L treatment was enzalutamide 47 patients (55%), abiraterone 23 (27%), cabazitaxel 7 (8%), docetaxel 4 (5%) and other therapies 4 (5%). Median 1L TTF was 6.3 months (95% CI, 4.9-7.6), PSA > 50% reduction was achieved in 32 of 89 patients (36%), median time from 1L to second-line treatment was 7.3 months (1.3-27.4), which did not differ significantly between treatment groups. Abiraterone, enzalutamide, cabazitaxel and docetaxel all demonstrate activity following progression on D-ADT. No difference in efficacy was detected between treatment options for mCRPC. Prospective trials investigating the optimal treatment sequence for prostate cancer following progression on D-ADT needed.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24938
DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13447
ORCID: 0000-0003-4930-4155
Journal: Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
PubMed URL: 32970925
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: androgen receptor antagonists
docetaxel
Prostate cancer
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

50
checked on Dec 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.