Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24526
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHasan, Syed Shahzad-
dc.contributor.authorRadford, Samuel T-
dc.contributor.authorKow, Chia Siang-
dc.contributor.authorZaidi, Syed Tabish Razi-
dc.date2020-08-03-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-28T20:42:04Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-28T20:42:04Z-
dc.date.issued2020-11-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis 2020; 50(4): 814-821en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24526-
dc.description.abstractMany aspects of care such as management of hypercoagulable state in COVID-19 patients, especially those admitted to intensive care units is challenging in the rapidly evolving pandemic of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We seek to systematically review the available evidence regarding the anticoagulation approach to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) among COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units. Electronic databases were searched for studies reporting venous thromboembolic events in patients admitted to the intensive care unit receiving any type of anticoagulation (prophylactic or therapeutic). The pooled prevalence (and 95% confidence interval [CI]) of VTE among patients receiving anticoagulant were calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup pooled analyses were performed with studies reported prophylactic anticoagulation alone and with studies reported mixed prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation. We included twelve studies (8 Europe; 2 UK; 1 each from the US and China) in our systematic review and meta-analysis. All studies utilized LMWH or unfractionated heparin as their pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis, either prophylactic doses or therapeutic doses. Seven studies reported on the proportion of patients with the previous history of VTE (range 0-10%). The pooled prevalence of VTE among ICU patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation across all studies was 31% (95% CI 20-43%). Subgroup pooled analysis limited to studies reported prophylactic anticoagulation alone and mixed (therapeutic and prophylactic anticoagulation) reported pooled prevalences of VTE of 38% (95% CI 10-70%) and 27% (95% CI 17-40%) respectively. With a high prevalence of thromboprophylaxis failure among COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care units, individualised rather than protocolised VTE thromboprophylaxis would appear prudent at interim.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectAnticoagulationen
dc.subjectCOVID-19en
dc.subjectCoronavirus 2019en
dc.subjectCritically illen
dc.subjectVenous thromboembolismen
dc.titleVenous thromboembolism in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysisen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UKen
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Careen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Postgraduate Studies, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UKen
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationLeeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UKen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11239-020-02235-zen
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4058-2215en
dc.identifier.pubmedid32748122
local.name.researcherRadford, Samuel T
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

62
checked on Jan 13, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.