Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24511
Title: Pandemic printing: a novel 3D-printed swab for detecting SARS-CoV-2.
Austin Authors: Williams, Eloise;Bond, Katherine;Isles, Nicole;Chong, Brian;Johnson, Douglas;Druce, Julian;Hoang, Tuyet;Ballard, Susan A;Hall, Victoria;Muhi, Stephen;Buising, Kirsty L;Lim, Seok;Strugnell, Dick;Catton, Mike;Irving, Louis B;Howden, Benjamin P ;Bert, Eric;Williamson, Deborah A
Affiliation: Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC
University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, VIC
Austin Health
Public Health Laboratory, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC
3DMEDitech, Melbourne, VIC
Issue Date: Sep-2020
Date: 2020-08-09
Publication information: Medical Journal of Australia 2020; 213(6): 276-279
Abstract: To design and evaluate 3D-printed nasal swabs for collection of samples for SARS-CoV-2 testing. An iterative design process was employed. Laboratory evaluation included in vitro assessment of mock nasopharyngeal samples spiked with two different concentrations of gamma-irradiated SARS-CoV-2. A prospective clinical study compared SARS-CoV-2 and human cellular material recovery by 3D-printed swabs and standard nasopharyngeal swabs. Royal Melbourne Hospital, May 2020. Participants in the clinical evaluation were 50 hospital staff members attending a COVID-19 screening clinic and two inpatients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. In the clinical evaluation, a flocked nasopharyngeal swab sample was collected with the Copan ESwab and a mid-nasal sample from the other nostril was collected with the 3D-printed swab. In the laboratory evaluation, qualitative agreement with regard to SARS-CoV-2 detection in mock samples collected with 3D-printed swabs and two standard swabs was complete. In the clinical evaluation, qualitative agreement with regard to RNase P detection (a surrogate measure of adequate collection of human cellular material) in samples collected from 50 hospital staff members with standard and 3D-printed swabs was complete. Qualitative agreement with regard to SARS-CoV-2 detection in three pairs of 3D-printed mid-nasal and standard swab samples from two inpatients with laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 was also complete. Using 3D-printed swabs to collect nasal samples for SARS-CoV-2 testing is feasible, acceptable to patients and health carers, and convenient.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/24511
DOI: 10.5694/mja2.50726
ORCID: 0000-0001-7363-6665
Journal: Medical Journal of Australia
PubMed URL: 32772375
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: COVID-19
Infectious diseases
Microbiology
Respiratory tract infections
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

34
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.