Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/22236
Title: Clinical benefit of presurgical EEG-fMRI in difficult-to-localize focal epilepsy: A single-institution retrospective review.
Austin Authors: Kowalczyk, Magdalena A;Omidvarnia, Amir;Abbott, David F ;Tailby, Chris ;Vaughan, David N;Jackson, Graeme D 
Affiliation: The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
The Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: Jan-2020
Date: 2019-12-02
Publication information: Epilepsia 2020; 61(1): 49-60
Abstract: The aim of this report is to present our clinical experience of electroencephalography-functional magnetic resonance imaging (EEG-fMRI) in localizing the epileptogenic focus, and to evaluate the clinical impact and challenges associated with the use of EEG-fMRI in pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy. We identified EEG-fMRI studies (n = 118) in people with focal epilepsy performed at our center from 2003 to 2018. Participants were referred from our Comprehensive Epilepsy Program in an exploratory research effort to address often difficult clinical questions, due to complex and difficult-to-localize epilepsy. We assessed the success of each study, the clinical utility of the result, and when surgery was performed, the postoperative outcome. Overall, 50% of EEG-fMRI studies were successful, meaning that data were of good quality and interictal epileptiform discharges were recorded. With an altered recruitment strategy since 2012 with increased inclusion of patients who were inpatients for video-EEG monitoring, we found that this patients in this selected group were more likely to have epileptic discharges detected during EEG-fMRI (96% of inpatients vs 29% of outpatients, P<.0001). To date, 48% (57 of 118) of patients have undergone epilepsy surgery. In 10 cases (17% of the 59 successful studies) the EEG-fMRI result had a "critical impact" on the surgical decision. These patients were difficult to localize because of subtle abnormalities, apparently normal MRI, or extensive structural abnormalities. All 10 had a good seizure outcome at 1 year after surgery (mean follow-up 6.5 years). EEG-fMRI results can assist identification of the epileptogenic focus in otherwise difficult-to-localize cases of pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy. Surgery determined largely by localization from the EEG-fMRI result can lead to good seizure outcomes. A limitation of this study is its retrospective design with nonconsecutive recruitment. Prospective clinical trials with well-defined inclusion criteria are needed to determine the overall benefit of EEG-fMRI for preoperative localization and postoperative outcome in focal epilepsy.
URI: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/22236
DOI: 10.1111/epi.16399
ORCID: 0000-0002-5410-0299
0000-0002-7259-8238
0000-0002-6225-7739
0000-0002-7917-5326
Journal: Epilepsia
PubMed URL: 31792958
Type: Journal Article
Subjects: EEG
epilepsy surgery
fMRI
focal epilepsy
Appears in Collections:Journal articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

68
checked on Sep 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.