Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20721
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Young, Rebekah | - |
dc.contributor.author | Norris, Briony | - |
dc.contributor.author | Reeves, Fairleigh | - |
dc.contributor.author | Peters, Justin | - |
dc.date | 2019-04-16 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-04-30T23:55:28Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-04-30T23:55:28Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-06 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Endourology 2019; 33(6): 498-502 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20721 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS) is the gold standard for undertaking prostate biopsy however it has been associated with higher rates of post-biopsy sepsis than transperineal biopsy (TP). To compare complication rates between transrectal prostate biopsy and transperineal biopsy for a single surgeon. Data were collected for all prostate biopsies undertaken by a single experienced urologist through his private rooms between February 2012 and March 2018. In total, 693 cases were included (560 individual men) in the final analysis (transrectal = 274, transperineal = 417). All patients were followed up two weeks post-biopsy and complications were recorded (sepsis, urinary tract infection, bleeding, acute urinary retention). Complications occurred in 37 cases (transrectal = 3, transperineal = 34). Sepsis occurred in one case following transrectal biopsy (0.36%) and two cases following transperineal biopsy (0.48%). Urinary tract infection occurred in two cases following transrectal biopsy (0.72%) and two cases following transperineal (0.48%). Bleeding occurred in one case following transperineal biopsy (0.24%). The most common complication was acute urinary retention, which occurred in 28 cases following transperineal biopsy (6.71%). Data from this study comparable complication rates for both transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsies in a single surgeon study. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | - |
dc.title | A retrospective comparison of trans-rectal and trans-perineal prostate biopsies: experience of a single surgeon. | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.identifier.journaltitle | Journal of Endourology | en |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | en |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Royal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street , Melbourne, Australia | en |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia | en |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia | en |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Epworth Richmond, Richmond, Victoria, Australia | en |
dc.identifier.affiliation | Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1089/end.2019.0170 | en |
dc.type.content | Text | en |
dc.identifier.pubmedid | 30990058 | - |
dc.type.austin | Journal Article | - |
item.openairetype | Journal Article | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.