Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20721
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Rebekah-
dc.contributor.authorNorris, Briony-
dc.contributor.authorReeves, Fairleigh-
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Justin-
dc.date2019-04-16-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-30T23:55:28Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-30T23:55:28Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Endourology 2019; 33(6): 498-502en
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20721-
dc.description.abstractTransrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS) is the gold standard for undertaking prostate biopsy however it has been associated with higher rates of post-biopsy sepsis than transperineal biopsy (TP). To compare complication rates between transrectal prostate biopsy and transperineal biopsy for a single surgeon. Data were collected for all prostate biopsies undertaken by a single experienced urologist through his private rooms between February 2012 and March 2018. In total, 693 cases were included (560 individual men) in the final analysis (transrectal = 274, transperineal = 417). All patients were followed up two weeks post-biopsy and complications were recorded (sepsis, urinary tract infection, bleeding, acute urinary retention). Complications occurred in 37 cases (transrectal = 3, transperineal = 34). Sepsis occurred in one case following transrectal biopsy (0.36%) and two cases following transperineal biopsy (0.48%). Urinary tract infection occurred in two cases following transrectal biopsy (0.72%) and two cases following transperineal (0.48%). Bleeding occurred in one case following transperineal biopsy (0.24%). The most common complication was acute urinary retention, which occurred in 28 cases following transperineal biopsy (6.71%). Data from this study comparable complication rates for both transperineal and transrectal prostate biopsies in a single surgeon study.en
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleA retrospective comparison of trans-rectal and trans-perineal prostate biopsies: experience of a single surgeon.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Endourologyen
dc.identifier.affiliationPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Melbourne Hospital, 300 Grattan Street , Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationEpworth Richmond, Richmond, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/end.2019.0170en
dc.type.contentTexten
dc.identifier.pubmedid30990058-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on Jan 28, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.