Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20606
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJamwal, Rebecca-
dc.contributor.authorCallaway, Libby-
dc.contributor.authorAckerl, Jane-
dc.contributor.authorFarnworth, Louise-
dc.contributor.authorWinkler, Di-
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-03T03:54:14Z-
dc.date.available2019-04-03T03:54:14Z-
dc.date.issued2017-02-01-
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal of Occupational Therapy 2017; 80(2): 89-98en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20606-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction People with severe acquired brain injury often require lifetime support, sometimes received from paid workers if living in shared supported accommodation. Electronic assistive technology may offer a less intrusive method of support that can enable autonomous participation and deliver cost savings. However, research on rates, barriers, and facilitators of electronic assistive technology uptake is lacking. This study aimed to identify electronic assistive technology types used by people with acquired brain injury living in shared supported accommodation, assess user satisfaction and psychosocial impact of electronic assistive technology, detail the impact of technology use on respondents’ participation and support needs, and describe barriers and/or facilitators to electronic assistive technology uptake and ongoing use. Method Participants were identified electronic assistive technology users with acquired brain injury living in shared supported accommodation in Australia (N = 22). Mixed methods data were collected using semi-structured interviews and published measures of support need, electronic assistive technology satisfaction, and psychosocial impact. Results Participants reported satisfaction with the devices they used, and positive psychosocial outcomes. Areas impacted by electronic assistive technology, key facilitators and barriers to electronic assistive technology use, and implications for occupational therapists working to deliver electronic assistive technology solutions were identified. Conclusion Electronic assistive technology use by this group can positively influence both everyday functioning and participation. Skilled prescription and ongoing support services are necessary to maximise uptake and use.en_US
dc.subjectAcquired brain injuryen_US
dc.subjectelectronic assistive technologyen_US
dc.subjectuser satisfactionen_US
dc.subjectsupported accommodationen_US
dc.titleElectronic assistive technology used by people with acquired brain injury in shared supported accommodation: Implications for occupational therapyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleBritish Journal of Occupational Therapyen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Monash Universityen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSummer Foundation Limited, Box Hill, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0308022616678634en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6777-0040en_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherJamwal, Rebecca
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptOccupational Therapy-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

56
checked on Dec 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.