Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20521
Title: | Pulmonary Rehabilitation does not Improve Objective Measures of Sleep Quality in People with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. | Austin Authors: | Cox, Narelle S ;Pepin, Véronique;Burge, Angela T ;Hill, Catherine J ;Lee, Annemarie L;Bondarenko, Janet;Moore, Rosemary;Nicolson, Caroline;Lahham, Aroub;Parwanta, Zohra;McDonald, Christine F ;Holland, Anne E | Affiliation: | Physiotherapy Institute for Breathing and Sleep Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia Monash University, Frankston, Australia Respiratory and Sleep Medicine School of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia Discipline of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Applied Physiology, Axe Maladies Chroniques, Centre de Recherche de l'Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada |
Issue Date: | Feb-2019 | Date: | 2019 | Publication information: | COPD 2019: 16(1): 25-29 | Abstract: | Abnormal sleep duration is associated with poor health. Upwards of 50% of people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) report poor sleep quality. The effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on self-reported sleep quality is variable. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on objectively measured sleep quality (via actigraphy) in people with COPD. Sleep quality was assessed objectively using the SenseWear Armband (SWA, BodyMedia, Pittsburgh, PA), worn for ≥4 days before and immediately after completing an 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation program. Sleep characteristics were derived from accelerometer positional data and registration of sleep state by the SWA, determined from energy expenditure. Forty-eight participants (n = 21 male) with COPD (mean (SD), age 70 (10) years, mean FEV1 55 (20) % predicted, mean 45 (24) pack year smoking history) contributed pre and post pulmonary rehabilitation sleep data to this analysis. No significant differences were seen in any sleep parameters after pulmonary rehabilitation (p = 0.07-0.70). There were no associations between sleep parameters and measures of quality of life or function (all p > 0.30). Sleep quality, measured objectively using actigraphy, did not improve after an 8-week pulmonary rehabilitation program in individuals with COPD. Whether on-going participation in regular exercise training beyond the duration of pulmonary rehabilitation may influence sleep quality, or whether improving sleep quality could enhance rehabilitation outcomes, is yet to be determined. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20521 | DOI: | 10.1080/15412555.2019.1567701 | ORCID: | 0000-0003-2090-0746 0000-0001-6481-3391 0000-0003-2061-845X |
Journal: | COPD | PubMed URL: | 30884984 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | COPD actigraphy pulmonary rehabilitation sleep |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.