Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20443
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRiddiough, Georgina E-
dc.contributor.authorFifis, Theodora-
dc.contributor.authorMuralidharan, Vijayaragavan-
dc.contributor.authorPerini, Marcos V-
dc.contributor.authorChristophi, Christopher-
dc.date2019-03-03-
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T22:35:09Z-
dc.date.available2019-03-14T22:35:09Z-
dc.date.issued2019-08-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology 2019; 34(8): 1276-1286-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/20443-
dc.description.abstractDespite excellent treatment of primary colorectal cancer (CRC) the majority of deaths occur as a result of metastasis to the liver. Recent population studies have estimated that one quarter of patients with CRC will incur synchronous or metachronous colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). However, only one quarter of these patients will be eligible for potentially curative resection. Tumour recurrence occurs in reportedly 60% of patients undergoing hepatic resection and the majority of intrahepatic recurrence occurs within the first 6 months of surgery. The livers innate ability to restore its homeostatic size and volume facilitates major hepatic resection which currently offers the only chance of cure to patients with extensive hepatic metastases. Experimental and clinical evidence supports the notion that following partial hepatectomy liver regeneration (LR) paradoxically drives tumour progression and increases the risk of recurrence. It is becoming increasingly clear that the processes which drive liver organogenesis, regeneration and tumour progression are inextricably linked. This presents a major hurdle in the management of CRLM and other hepatic malignancies because therapies that reduce the risk of recurrence without hampering LR are sought. The processes and pathways underlying these phenomena are multiple, complex and cross-communicate. In this review we will summarise the common mechanisms contributing to both LR and tumour recurrence.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectcolorectal liver metastasis-
dc.subjecthepatectomy-
dc.subjectliver regeneration-
dc.subjectrecurrence-
dc.titleSearching for the link; mechanisms underlying liver regeneration and recurrence of colorectal liver metastasis post partial hepatectomy.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Austin Health, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jgh.14644-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-8247-8937-
dc.identifier.pubmedid30828863-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
dc.type.austinReview-
local.name.researcherChristophi, Christopher
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptHepatopancreatobiliary Surgery-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptVictorian Liver Transplant Unit-
crisitem.author.deptHepatopancreatobiliary Surgery-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptSurgery-
crisitem.author.deptHepatopancreatobiliary Surgery-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

42
checked on Nov 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.