Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19570
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaid, Catherine M-
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Meg E-
dc.contributor.authorMcGinley, Jennifer L-
dc.contributor.authorSzoeke, Cassandra-
dc.contributor.authorWorkman, Barbara-
dc.contributor.authorLiew, Danny-
dc.contributor.authorHill, Keith D-
dc.contributor.authorWoodward, Michael M-
dc.contributor.authorWittwer, Joanne E-
dc.contributor.authorChurilov, Leonid-
dc.contributor.authorDanoudis, Mary-
dc.contributor.authorBernhardt, Julie-
dc.date2018-09-17-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-11T02:50:06Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-11T02:50:06Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of physiotherapy 2018; 64(4): 237-244-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19570-
dc.description.abstractAmong older people receiving inpatient rehabilitation, does additional supervised physical activity lead to faster self-selected gait speed at discharge? Does additional supervised physical activity lead to better mobility, function and quality of life at discharge and 6 months following discharge? Multi-centre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis. Older people (age>60years) from two Australian hospitals undergoing rehabilitation to improve mobility. Participants received multidisciplinary care, including physiotherapy. During hospital rehabilitation, the experimental group (n=99) spent additional time daily performing physical activities that emphasised upright mobility tasks; the control group (n=99) spent equal time participating in social activities. Self-selected gait speed was the primary outcome at discharge and a secondary outcome at the 6-month follow-up. Timed Up and Go, De Morton Mobility Index, Functional Independence Measure and quality of life were secondary outcomes at discharge and tertiary outcomes at the 6-month follow-up. The experimental group received a median of 20 additional minutes per day (IQR 15.0 to 22.5) of upright activities for a median of 16.5days (IQR 10.0 to 25.0). Gait speed did not differ between groups at discharge. Mean gait speed was 0.51m/s (SD 0.29) in the experimental group and 0.56m/s (SD 0.28) in the control group (effect size -0.06m/s, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.01, p=0.096). No significant differences were detected in other secondary measures. While substantial gains in mobility were achieved by older people receiving inpatient rehabilitation, additional physical activity sessions did not lead to better walking outcomes at discharge or 6 months. ACTRN12613000884707. [Said CM, Morris ME, McGinley JL, Szoeke C, Workman B, Liew D, Hill KD, Woodward M, Wittwer JE, Churilov L, Danoudis M, Bernhardt J (2018) Additional structured physical activity does not improve walking in older people (> 60 years) undergoing inpatient rehabilitation: a randomised trial. Journal of Physiotherapy 64: 237-244].-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectExercise therapy-
dc.subjectHospitalisation-
dc.subjectMobility limitation-
dc.subjectRandomised controlled trial-
dc.subjectRehabilitation-
dc.titleAdditional structured physical activity does not improve walking in older people (>60years) undergoing inpatient rehabilitation: a randomised trial.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of physiotherapy-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Aged Care Services, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Medicine, The University of Melbourneen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationPhysiotherapy, Melbourne School of Health Sciences, The University of Melbourne-
dc.identifier.affiliationLa Trobe Centre for Exercise and Sports Medicine Research, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne-
dc.identifier.affiliationNorthpark Private Hospital, Healthscope Australia, Melbourne-
dc.identifier.affiliationHealthy Ageing Program, Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne-
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Medical Research, The Royal Melbourne Hospital-
dc.identifier.affiliationInstitute for Health and Ageing, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne-
dc.identifier.affiliationRehabilitation and Aged Care Services, Monash Health, Melbourne; Monash Ageing Research Centre (MONARC), Monash University, Melbourne-
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne-
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth-
dc.identifier.affiliationStatistics and Decision Analysis Academic Platform, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience & Mental Health, Melbourne; School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne-
dc.identifier.affiliationStroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jphys.2018.08.006-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-8773-9750-
dc.identifier.pubmedid30236471-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherChurilov, Leonid
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptPhysiotherapy-
crisitem.author.deptAged Care-
crisitem.author.deptGeriatric Medicine-
crisitem.author.deptMedicine (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

62
checked on Oct 1, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.