Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19364
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYoung, Paul J-
dc.contributor.authorBagshaw, Sean M-
dc.contributor.authorForbes, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorNichol, Alistair-
dc.contributor.authorWright, Stephen E-
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldo-
dc.contributor.authorBailey, Michael J-
dc.contributor.authorBeasley, Richard W-
dc.contributor.authorEastwood, Glenn M-
dc.contributor.authorFesta, Marino-
dc.contributor.authorGattas, David-
dc.contributor.authorvan Haren, Frank-
dc.contributor.authorLitton, Edward-
dc.contributor.authorMouncey, Paul R-
dc.contributor.authorNavarra, Leanlove-
dc.contributor.authorPilcher, David-
dc.contributor.authorMackle, Diane M-
dc.contributor.authorMcArthur, Colin J-
dc.contributor.authorMcGuinness, Shay P-
dc.contributor.authorSaxena, Manoj K-
dc.contributor.authorWebb, Steve-
dc.contributor.authorRowan, Kathryn M-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-17T01:47:02Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-17T01:47:02Z-
dc.date.issued2018-09-
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care and Resuscitation 2018; 20(3): 182-189-
dc.identifier.issn1441-2772-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/19364-
dc.description.abstractThe balance of risks and benefits with using proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) versus histamine-2 receptor blockers (H2RB) for stress ulcer prophylaxis in patients who are invasively ventilated in the intensive care unit (ICU) is uncertain. To describe the study protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Proton Pump Inhibitors versus Histamine-2 Receptor Blockers for Ulcer Prophylaxis Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit (PEPTIC) study. Protocol for a prospective, multicentre, randomised, open-label, cluster crossover, registry-embedded trial to be conducted in 50 ICUs in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. The PEPTIC study will compare two approaches to stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated adults implemented at the level of the ICU. One approach is to use PPIs as the default therapy and the other approach is to use H2RBs as the default therapy when stress ulcer prophylaxis is prescribed. Each ICU, by random allocation, will use one approach for 6 months and will then switch to the opposite approach for the next 6 months. The PEPTIC study began recruitment in August 2016 and will complete recruitment in January 2019. The primary end point will be in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes include clinically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding, Clostridium difficile infection, ICU length of stay and hospital length of stay. The PEPTIC study will compare the effect on in-hospital mortality of implementing, at the level of the ICU, the use of PPI as the preferred agent for stress ulcer prophylaxis in mechanically ventilated adults in the ICU with using H2RB as the preferred agent. Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTRN 12616000481471).-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.subjectStomach Ulcer/prevention & controlen
dc.subjectIntensive Care Unitsen
dc.subjectHistamine H2 Antagonists/therapeutic useen
dc.subjectProton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic useen
dc.titleA cluster randomised, crossover, registry-embedded clinical trial of proton pump inhibitors versus histamine-2 receptor blockers for ulcer prophylaxis therapy in the intensive care unit (PEPTIC study): study protocol.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleCritical Care and Resuscitation-
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada-
dc.identifier.affiliationBiostatistics Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine at Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Perioperative and Critical Care, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom-
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Canberra Hospital, Canberra, ACT, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand-
dc.identifier.affiliationThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationClinical Trials Unit, Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre, London, United Kingdom-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1650-8939-
dc.identifier.pubmedid30153780-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherBellomo, Rinaldo
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

70
checked on Oct 3, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.