Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18919
Title: | Faster Blood Flow Rate Does Not Improve Circuit Life in Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. | Austin Authors: | Fealy, Nigel G ;Aitken, Leanne;du Toit, Eugene;Lo, Serigne;Baldwin, Ian C | Affiliation: | Melanoma Institute Australia, Research and Biostatistics group, Wollstonecraft, NSW, Australia Intensive Care Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia School of Health Sciences, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Centre for Health Practice Innovation, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD, Australia School of Medical Science, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Sydney, QLD, Australia |
Issue Date: | Oct-2017 | Publication information: | Critical Care Medicine 2017; 45(10): e1018-e1025 | Abstract: | To determine whether blood flow rate influences circuit life in continuous renal replacement therapy. Prospective randomized controlled trial. Single center tertiary level ICU. Critically ill adults requiring continuous renal replacement therapy. Patients were randomized to receive one of two blood flow rates: 150 or 250 mL/min. The primary outcome was circuit life measured in hours. Circuit and patient data were collected until each circuit clotted or was ceased electively for nonclotting reasons. Data for clotted circuits are presented as median (interquartile range) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Survival probability for clotted circuits was compared using log-rank test. Circuit clotting data were analyzed for repeated events using hazards ratio. One hundred patients were randomized with 96 completing the study (150 mL/min, n = 49; 250 mL/min, n = 47) using 462 circuits (245 run at 150 mL/min and 217 run at 250 mL/min). Median circuit life for first circuit (clotted) was similar for both groups (150 mL/min: 9.1 hr [5.5-26 hr] vs 10 hr [4.2-17 hr]; p = 0.37). Continuous renal replacement therapy using blood flow rate set at 250 mL/min was not more likely to cause clotting compared with 150 mL/min (hazards ratio, 1.00 [0.60-1.69]; p = 0.68). Gender, body mass index, weight, vascular access type, length, site, and mode of continuous renal replacement therapy or international normalized ratio had no effect on clotting risk. Continuous renal replacement therapy without anticoagulation was more likely to cause clotting compared with use of heparin strategies (hazards ratio, 1.62; p = 0.003). Longer activated partial thromboplastin time (hazards ratio, 0.98; p = 0.002) and decreased platelet count (hazards ratio, 1.19; p = 0.03) were associated with a reduced likelihood of circuit clotting. There was no difference in circuit life whether using blood flow rates of 250 or 150 mL/min during continuous renal replacement therapy. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18919 | DOI: | 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002568 | Journal: | Critical Care Medicine | PubMed URL: | 28658026 | Type: | Journal Article |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.