Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18742
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDoan, Tan N-
dc.contributor.authorKirkpatrick, Carl M J-
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Patricia-
dc.contributor.authorSlavin, Monica A-
dc.contributor.authorAnanda-Rajah, Michelle R-
dc.contributor.authorMorrissey, C Orla-
dc.contributor.authorUrbancic, Karen F-
dc.contributor.authorGrigg, Andrew P-
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorSzer, Jeffrey-
dc.contributor.authorSeymour, John F-
dc.contributor.authorKong, David C M-
dc.date2015-10-30-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-30T06:54:45Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-30T06:54:45Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-
dc.identifier.citationThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 2016; 71(2): 497-505-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/18742-
dc.description.abstractThe primary objectives were to investigate the prescribing practices of primary antifungal prophylaxis (PAP) and incidence of invasive fungal disease (IFD) in adult patients with ALL receiving induction-consolidation chemotherapy. Secondary objectives were to determine risk factors for IFD and resource utilization associated with IFD. A retrospective chart review of adult patients with ALL from commencement of induction until completion of consolidation chemotherapy was undertaken from January 2008 to June 2013 in four hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. IFD was classified according to the revised European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Cost analysis was performed from an Australian public hospital perspective. Ninety-eight patients were included in the audit; 83 (85%) received PAP. Most patients (49/83, 59%) switched between two different antifungal agents, predominantly between liposomal amphotericin B and an azole. Five proven/probable and six possible IFD cases were identified. Proven/probable IFD was most common in patients receiving the BFM95 chemotherapy protocol. The incidence of proven/probable IFD was significantly lower in patients receiving PAP compared with those who did not (2/78, 2.6% versus 3/14, 21.4%; P = 0.024). For every five patients receiving PAP, one proven/probable IFD case would be prevented. Proven/probable IFD was associated with an additional median cost of 121,520 Australian dollars (95% CI: 90,781-180,141 Australian dollars; P < 0.001) compared with patients without IFD. This is the first multicentre study evaluating PAP use in patients with ALL. With the caveats of interpretation of retrospective, non-randomized data, PAP was associated with a reduced IFD risk.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titlePrimary antifungal prophylaxis in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: a multicentre audit.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplant Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Victorianen
dc.identifier.affiliationInfectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationGeneral Medicine Unit, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Haematology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationPharmacy Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen
dc.identifier.affiliationMalignant Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Service, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationCentre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jac/dkv343-
dc.identifier.pubmedid26518050-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
dc.type.austinMulticenter Study-
dc.type.austinResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't-
local.name.researcherGrigg, Andrew P
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptPharmacy-
crisitem.author.deptOlivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre-
crisitem.author.deptClinical Haematology-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

74
checked on Mar 10, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.