Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17886
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTumlin, James A-
dc.contributor.authorMurugan, Raghavan-
dc.contributor.authorDeane, Adam M-
dc.contributor.authorOstermann, Marlies-
dc.contributor.authorBusse, Laurence W-
dc.contributor.authorHam, Kealy R-
dc.contributor.authorKashani, Kianoush-
dc.contributor.authorSzerlip, Harold M-
dc.contributor.authorProwle, John R-
dc.contributor.authorBihorac, Azra-
dc.contributor.authorFinkel, Kevin W-
dc.contributor.authorZarbock, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorForni, Lui G-
dc.contributor.authorLynch, Shannan J-
dc.contributor.authorJensen, Jeff-
dc.contributor.authorKroll, Stew-
dc.contributor.authorChawla, Lakhmir S-
dc.contributor.authorTidmarsh, George F-
dc.contributor.authorBellomo, Rinaldo-
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-19T06:24:12Z-
dc.date.available2018-06-19T06:24:12Z-
dc.date.issued2018-06-
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care Medicine 2018; 46(6): 949-957-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/17886-
dc.description.abstractAcute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy in severe vasodilatory shock is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. Angiotensin II treatment may help these patients by potentially restoring renal function without decreasing intrarenal oxygenation. We analyzed the impact of angiotensin II on the outcomes of acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy. Post hoc analysis of the Angiotensin II for the Treatment of High-Output Shock 3 trial. ICUs. Patients with acute kidney injury treated with renal replacement therapy at initiation of angiotensin II or placebo (n = 45 and n = 60, respectively). IV angiotensin II or placebo. Primary end point: survival through day 28; secondary outcomes included renal recovery through day 7 and increase in mean arterial pressure from baseline of ≥ 10 mm Hg or increase to ≥ 75 mm Hg at hour 3. Survival rates through day 28 were 53% (95% CI, 38%-67%) and 30% (95% CI, 19%-41%) in patients treated with angiotensin II and placebo (p = 0.012), respectively. By day 7, 38% (95% CI, 25%-54%) of angiotensin II patients discontinued RRT versus 15% (95% CI, 8%-27%) placebo (p = 0.007). Mean arterial pressure response was achieved in 53% (95% CI, 38%-68%) and 22% (95% CI, 12%-34%) of patients treated with angiotensin II and placebo (p = 0.001), respectively. In patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy at study drug initiation, 28-day survival and mean arterial pressure response were higher, and rate of renal replacement therapy liberation was greater in the angiotensin II group versus the placebo group. These findings suggest that patients with vasodilatory shock and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy may preferentially benefit from angiotensin II.-
dc.language.isoeng-
dc.titleOutcomes in Patients with Vasodilatory Shock and Renal Replacement Therapy Treated with Intravenous Angiotensin II.-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.identifier.journaltitleCritical Care Medicine-
dc.identifier.affiliationKing's College London, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UKen
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga TN-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, and Clinical and Translational Science, Center for Critical Care Nephrology, CRISMA, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA-
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Grattan St, Parkville, Victoria, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationEmory University, Department of Medicine, Atlanta, GA-
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Minnesota Medical School-
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN-
dc.identifier.affiliationBaylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX-
dc.identifier.affiliationAdult Critical Care Unit, Department of Renal and Transplant Medicine, The Royal London Hospital, London, UK-
dc.identifier.affiliationDivision of Nephrology, Hypertension, & Renal Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL-
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Surrey & Critical Care Unit, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK-
dc.identifier.affiliationLa Jolla Pharmaceutical Company-
dc.identifier.affiliationThe University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Intensive Care, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/CCM.0000000000003092-
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-1650-8939-
dc.identifier.pubmedid29509568-
dc.type.austinJournal Article-
local.name.researcherBellomo, Rinaldo
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptIntensive Care-
crisitem.author.deptData Analytics Research and Evaluation (DARE) Centre-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

30
checked on Dec 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.