Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16743
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGabbe, Belinda J-
dc.contributor.authorSimpson, Pam M-
dc.contributor.authorCameron, Peter A-
dc.contributor.authorPonsford, Jennie-
dc.contributor.authorLyons, Ronan A-
dc.contributor.authorCollie, Alex-
dc.contributor.authorFitzgerald, Mark-
dc.contributor.authorJudson, Rodney-
dc.contributor.authorTeague, Warwick J-
dc.contributor.authorBraaf, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorNunn, Andrew-
dc.contributor.authorAmeratunga, Shanthi-
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, James E-
dc.date2017-07-05-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-27T07:25:16Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-27T07:25:16Z-
dc.date.issued2017-07-05-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS Medicine 2017; 14(7): e1002322en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16743-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Improved understanding of the quality of survival of patients is crucial in evaluating trauma care, understanding recovery patterns and timeframes, and informing healthcare, social, and disability service provision. We aimed to describe the longer-term health status of seriously injured patients, identify predictors of outcome, and establish recovery trajectories by population characteristics. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A population-based, prospective cohort study using the Victorian State Trauma Registry (VSTR) was undertaken. We followed up 2,757 adult patients, injured between July 2011 and June 2012, through deaths registry linkage and telephone interview at 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-months postinjury. The 3-level EuroQol 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L) was collected, and mixed-effects regression modelling was used to identify predictors of outcome, and recovery trajectories, for the EQ-5D-3L items and summary score. Mean (SD) age of participants was 50.8 (21.6) years, and 72% were male. Twelve percent (n = 333) died during their hospital stay, 8.1% (n = 222) of patients died postdischarge, and 155 (7.0%) were known to have survived to 36-months postinjury but were lost to follow-up at all time points. The prevalence of reporting problems at 36-months postinjury was 37% for mobility, 21% for self-care, 47% for usual activities, 50% for pain/discomfort, and 41% for anxiety/depression. Continued improvement to 36-months postinjury was only present for the usual activities item; the adjusted relative risk (ARR) of reporting problems decreased from 6 to 12 (ARR 0.87, 95% CI: 0.83-0.90), 12 to 24 (ARR 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90-0.98), and 24 to 36 months (ARR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.95-0.99). The risk of reporting problems with pain or discomfort increased from 24- to 36-months postinjury (ARR 1.06, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.12). While loss to follow-up was low, there was responder bias with patients injured in intentional events, younger, and less seriously injured patients less likely to participate; therefore, these patient subgroups were underrepresented in the study findings. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ongoing problems at 3-years postinjury is high, confirming that serious injury is frequently a chronic disorder. These findings have implications for trauma system design. Investment in interventions to reduce the longer-term impact of injuries is needed, and greater investment in primary prevention is needed.en_US
dc.subjectHealth Statusen_US
dc.subjectQuality of Lifeen_US
dc.subjectWounds and Injuriesen_US
dc.titleLong-term health status and trajectories of seriously injured patients: a population-based longitudinal studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitlePLoS Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationFarr Institute, Swansea University Medical School, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdomen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationEmergency and Trauma Centre, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationMonash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationInsurance Work and Health Group, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationTrauma Service, The Alfred, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationTrauma Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationTrauma Service, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSurgical Research Group, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationVictorian Spinal Cord Service, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSection of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealanden_US
dc.identifier.affiliationResearch Centre for Injury Studies, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28678814en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pmed.1002322en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

26
checked on Nov 19, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.