Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16698
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoach, Paul J-
dc.contributor.authorFrancis, Roslyn -
dc.contributor.authorEmmett, Louise -
dc.contributor.author Hsiao, Edward-
dc.contributor.author Kneebone, Andrew-
dc.contributor.author Hruby, George-
dc.contributor.authorEade, Thomas -
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Quoc A -
dc.contributor.authorThompson , Benjamin D -
dc.contributor.authorCusick , Thomas -
dc.contributor.authorMcCarthy, Michael -
dc.contributor.authorTang, Colin -
dc.contributor.authorHo, Bao -
dc.contributor.authorStricker, Philip D -
dc.contributor.authorScott , Andrew M -
dc.date2017-06-23-
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-29T02:49:43Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-29T02:49:43Z-
dc.date.issued2018-01-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Nuclear Medicine 2018; 59(1): 82-88en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16698-
dc.description.abstract68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scanning has been shown to be more sensitive than conventional imaging techniques in patients with prostate cancer. This prospective Australian multicenter study assessed whether 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging impacts on management intent in patients with primary or recurrent prostate cancer. Methods: Prior to undertaking 68Ga-PSMA PET imaging, referring medical specialists completed a questionnaire detailing relevant demographic and clinical data as well as their proposed management plan. A separate follow up questionnaire was completed after the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scan results were available to determine whether their management plan would change. Results: A total of 431 patients with prostate cancer from four Australian centers had pre- and post-68Ga-PSMA management plans completed. Scans were performed for primary staging of intermediate and high risk disease in 25% patients and for restaging/biochemical recurrence in 75% of patients. Overall, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scanning led to a change in planned management in 51% of patients. The impact was greater in the group of patients with biochemical failure post definitive surgery and /or radiation treatment (62% change in management intent) compared with patients undergoing primary staging (21% change). Imaging with 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT revealed unsuspected disease in the prostate bed in 27% of patients, locoregional lymph nodes in 39% and distant metastatic disease in 16% of patients. Conclusion:68Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans detect previously unsuspected disease and may influence planned clinical management in a high proportion of patients with prostate cancer. The impact was greater in patients with biochemical recurrence. This demonstrates the potential clinical value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in management of prostate cancer.en_US
dc.subjectOncologyen_US
dc.subjectGUen_US
dc.subjectPET/CTen_US
dc.subjectPSMAen_US
dc.subjectManagement impacten_US
dc.subjectProstate canceren_US
dc.titleThe impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT on management intent in prostate cancer: results of an Australian prospective multicenter studyen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Nuclear Medicineen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationRoyal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralasian Radiopharmaceutical Trials Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliation University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliation Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSt Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre – New South Wales (APCRC‐NSW), Sydney, New South Wales, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationFiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSt Vincent's Prostate Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationAustin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationOlivia Newton‐John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationSchool of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.type.studyortrialMulticentre Studiesen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28646014en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2967/jnumed.117.197160en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6656-295Xen_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Jan 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.