Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16681
Title: | Examining maintenance care following infliximab salvage therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis | Austin Authors: | Seah, Dean ;Choy, Matthew C ;Gorelik, Alexandra;Connell, William R;Sparrow, Miles P;van Langenberg, Daniel;Hebbard, Geoffrey;Moore, Gregory;De Cruz, Peter | Affiliation: | Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department of Medicine, Austin Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Melbourne EpiCentre, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Gastroenterology, Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Medicine (University of Melbourne) |
Issue Date: | Jan-2018 | Publication information: | Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2018; 33(1): 226-231 | Abstract: | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data supporting the optimal maintenance drug therapy & strategy to monitor ongoing response following successful infliximab (IFX) induction, for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), are limited. We aimed to evaluate maintenance & monitoring strategies employed in patients post IFX induction therapy. METHODS: Patients in 6 Australian tertiary centres treated with IFX for steroid-refractory ASUC between April 2014 & May 2015 were identified via hospital IBD & pharmacy databases. Patients were followed-up for 1 year with clinical data over 12 months recorded. Analysis was limited to patient outcomes beyond 3 months. RESULTS: 41 patients were identified. 5/41 (12%) patients underwent colectomy within 3 months and 1 patient was lost to follow-up. 6/35 (17%) of the remaining patients progressed to colectomy by 12 months. MAINTENANCE THERAPY: Patients maintained on thiopurine monotherapy (14/35) vs. IFX/thiopurine therapy (15/35) were followed up. 2/15 (13%) patients who received combination maintenance therapy underwent a colectomy at 12 months, compared with 1/14 (7%) patients receiving thiopurine monotherapy (p=0.610). MONITORING DURING MAINTENANCE: Post-discharge, thiopurine metabolites were monitored in 15/27 (56%); faecal calprotectin in 11/32 (34%); & serum IFX levels in 4/20 (20%). 20/32 (63%) patients had an endoscopic evaluation after IFX salvage with median time to 1st endoscopy of 109 days (IQR 113-230). CONCLUSION: Following IFX induction therapy for ASUC, the uptake of maintenance therapy in this cohort & strategies to monitor ongoing response were variable. These data suggest that the optimal maintenance & monitoring strategy post IFX salvage therapy remains to be defined. | URI: | https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16681 | DOI: | 10.1111/jgh.13850 | ORCID: | Journal: | Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology | PubMed URL: | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28618062 | Type: | Journal Article | Subjects: | Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis Infliximab Maintenance Therapy Monitoring Thiopurine |
Appears in Collections: | Journal articles |
Show full item record
Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.