Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16613
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMachan, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorChurilov, Leonid-
dc.contributor.authorHu, Raymond-
dc.contributor.authorPeyton, Philip J-
dc.contributor.authorTan, Chong O-
dc.contributor.authorPillai, Parameswan-
dc.contributor.authorEllard, Louise-
dc.contributor.authorHarley, Ian-
dc.contributor.authorStory, David A-
dc.contributor.authorHayward, Philip A R-
dc.contributor.authorMatalanis, George-
dc.contributor.authorRoubos, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorSeevanayagam, Sivendran-
dc.contributor.authorWeinberg, Laurence-
dc.date2016-12-30-
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-19T23:15:18Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-19T23:15:18Z-
dc.date.issued2017-12-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 2017; 31(6): 2000-2009en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://ahro.austin.org.au/austinjspui/handle/1/16613-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVES: To compare the physiology of apneic oxygenation with low-tidal-volume (VT) ventilation during harvesting of the left internal mammary artery. DESIGN: Prospective, single-center, randomized trial. SETTING: Single-center teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 24 patients who underwent elective coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Apneic oxygenation (apneic group: 12 participants) and low-VT ventilation (low-VT group: 12 participants) (2.5 mL/kg ideal body weight) for 15 minutes during harvesting of the left internal mammary artery. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary endpoint was an absolute change in partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2). Secondary endpoints were changes in arterial pH, pulmonary artery pressures (PAP), cardiac index, and pulmonary artery acceleration time and ease of surgical access. The mean (standard deviation) absolute increase in PaCO2 was 31.8 mmHg (7.6) in the apneic group and 17.6 mmHg (8.2) in the low-VT group (baseline-adjusted difference 14.2 mmHg [95% confidence interval 21.0-7.3], p<0.001). The mean (standard deviation) absolute decrease in pH was 0.15 (0.03) in the apneic group and 0.09 (0.03) in the low-VT group baseline-adjusted difference 0.06 [95% confidence interval 0.03-0.09], p<0.001. Differences in the rate of change over time between groups (time-by-treatment interaction) were observed for PaCO2 (p<0.001), pH (p<0.001), systolic PAP (p = 0.002), diastolic PAP (p = 0.023), and mean PAP (p = 0.034). Both techniques provided adequate ease of surgical access; however, apneic oxygenation was preferred predominantly. CONCLUSIONS: Apneic oxygenation caused a greater degree of hypercarbia and respiratory acidemia compared with low-VT ventilation. Neither technique had deleterious effects on PAP or cardiac function. Both techniques provided adequate ease of surgical access.en_US
dc.subjectApneic oxygenationen_US
dc.subjectCardiac functionen_US
dc.subjectCardiac surgeryen_US
dc.subjectHypercarbiaen_US
dc.subjectLow-tidal-volume ventilationen_US
dc.subjectPulmonary artery pressuresen_US
dc.subjectRespiratory acidemiaen_US
dc.titleApneic oxygenation versus low-tidal-volume ventilation in anesthetized cardiac surgical patients: a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.identifier.journaltitleJournal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationUniversity of Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Anaesthesia, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Surgery and Centre for Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.affiliationDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28284927en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1053/j.jvca.2016.12.019en_US
dc.type.contentTexten_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-6479-1310en_US
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-7403-7680en_US
dc.type.austinJournal Articleen_US
local.name.researcherChurilov, Leonid
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptMedicine (University of Melbourne)-
crisitem.author.deptThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
crisitem.author.deptInstitute for Breathing and Sleep-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
crisitem.author.deptCardiac Surgery-
crisitem.author.deptCardiac Surgery-
crisitem.author.deptAnaesthesia-
Appears in Collections:Journal articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

66
checked on Nov 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in AHRO are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.